Figure 1
(A) Schematic timeline of MSN differentiation. (B) qPCR data from RNA extracted at 19DIV after treatment with Activin (25 ng/ml) alone or plus SB431542 (10 µM) as shown in panel (A). Data show mean RQ ± SEM relative to control (n = 6, 6 and 2, respectively). (C) qPCR data from RNA extracted 1 or 6 days after treatment that began at 10DIV. Cells were untreated (control) or treated with Activin (25 ng/ml), or Activin plus SB525334 (1 µM), LY2109761 (5 µM) or LDN193189 (100 nM). Data show mean RQ ± SEM relative to the 10DIV+1 control (n = 2 per group). (D) A repeat of the experiment in panel (C) with just control, Activin and Activin plus LDN conditions to confirm the LDN effects on CTIP2 and GSH2 up-regulation. Data show mean RQ ± SEM relative to the 10DIV+1 control (n = 3 per group; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001; two-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni).
Differential roles for TGFβ signalling in LGE fate induction in hPSCs

(A) Schematic timeline of MSN differentiation. (B) qPCR data from RNA extracted at 19DIV after treatment with Activin (25 ng/ml) alone or plus SB431542 (10 µM) as shown in panel (A). Data show mean RQ ± SEM relative to control (n = 6, 6 and 2, respectively). (C) qPCR data from RNA extracted 1 or 6 days after treatment that began at 10DIV. Cells were untreated (control) or treated with Activin (25 ng/ml), or Activin plus SB525334 (1 µM), LY2109761 (5 µM) or LDN193189 (100 nM). Data show mean RQ ± SEM relative to the 10DIV+1 control (n = 2 per group). (D) A repeat of the experiment in panel (C) with just control, Activin and Activin plus LDN conditions to confirm the LDN effects on CTIP2 and GSH2 up-regulation. Data show mean RQ ± SEM relative to the 10DIV+1 control (n = 3 per group; *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001; two-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal