Figure 7
(A), (B) and (C) Representative gels of at least three independent biological experiments showing EXO1 catalysing forked, gap and nick DNA substrates with a 5′ flap of (A) 1 nt, (B) 5 nt and (C) 10 nt. (D) Statistical analysis of degradation of fork, gap and nick substrate of different length by EXO1. One-way analysis of variance with Tukey's multiple-comparison test with significance. The letters indicate F=fork, G=gap and N=nick substrate, ns=not significant. Stars in the table indicated the significance (P<0.05) between the different parameters.
Fork, gap and nick DNA configurations are differently processed by EXO1

(A), (B) and (C) Representative gels of at least three independent biological experiments showing EXO1 catalysing forked, gap and nick DNA substrates with a 5′ flap of (A) 1 nt, (B) 5 nt and (C) 10 nt. (D) Statistical analysis of degradation of fork, gap and nick substrate of different length by EXO1. One-way analysis of variance with Tukey's multiple-comparison test with significance. The letters indicate F=fork, G=gap and N=nick substrate, ns=not significant. Stars in the table indicated the significance (P<0.05) between the different parameters.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal