After bolus and continuous enteral feeding of the same protein, different digestion and absorption kinetics and anabolic responses are observed. Establishing which mode of feeding has the highest anabolic potential in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may aid in the prevention of muscle wasting, but an important confounding factor is the duration of assessments after bolus feeding. We hypothesized that the anabolic response to bolus and continuous feeding in COPD patients is comparable when methodological issues are addressed. Twenty-one older adults (12 patients with stage II–IV COPD and 9 healthy controls) were studied after intake of a fast-absorbing hydrolyzed casein protein–carbohydrate mixture either as a single bolus or as small sips (crossover design). Whole body protein synthesis (PS), breakdown (PB), net PS (PS − PB) protein efficiency (netPSPE), net protein balance (phenylalanine (PHE) intake – PHE hydroxylation) protein efficiency (netBalPE), and splanchnic PHE extraction (SPEPHE) were assessed using stable isotope tracer methodology. Bolus feeding assessments were done at 90, 95, and 99% of the calculated duration of the anabolic response. At 99%, netBalPE was higher for sip feeding than bolus feeding in both groups (P<0.0001). Nevertheless, bolus feeding was associated with a lower SPEPHE (P<0.0001) and higher netPSPE (P<0.0001). At 90% compared with 99%, PS and netBalPE after bolus feeding was significantly overestimated. In conclusion, several factors complicate a comparison of the anabolic capacity of bolus and continuous feeding in acute studies, including the critical role of SPE calculation and assumptions, and the duration of postprandial assessments after bolus feeding.

You do not currently have access to this content.