Abstract
Lipase’s thermostability and organic solvent tolerance are two crucial properties that enable it to function as a biocatalyst. The present study examined the characteristics of two recombinant thermostable lipases (Lk2, Lk3) based on transesterification activity. Conversion of C12-C18 methyl ester with paranitrophenol was investigated in various organic solvent. Both lipases exhibited activity on difference carbon chain length (C12 - C18, C18:1, C18:2) of substrates. The activity of Lk2 was higher in each of substrate compared with that of Lk3. Experimental findings showed that the best substrates for Lk2 and Lk3 are C18:1 and C18:2 respectively, in agreement with the computational analysis. The activity of both enzymes prefers on nonpolar solvent. On nonpolar solvent the enzymes are able to keep its native folding shown by the value of radius gyration, solvent–enzyme interaction and orientation of triad catalytic residues. Lk3 appeared to be more thermostable, with maximum activity at 55°C. The presence of Fe3+ increased the activity of Lk2 and Lk3. However, the activity of both enzymes were dramatically decreased by the present of Ca2+ despite of the enzymes belong to family I.1 lipase known as calcium dependent enzyme. Molecular analysis on His loop of Lk2 and Lk3 on the present of Ca2+ showed that there were shifting on the orientation of catalytic triad residues. All the data suggest that Lk2 and Lk3 are novel lipase on the family I.1 and both lipase available as a biocatalyst candidate.
Introduction
Lipase are a group of hydrolase enzymes showing broad catalytic capabilities, including hydrolysis, esters synthesis, transesterification (acidolysis, interesterification and alcoholysis) and also aminolysis [1,2]. Lipase families were grouped into eight families and six sub-families of true lipase [3]. Today, lipase families comprise 35 families and 11 subfamilies of true lipase [4,5]. Lipases are used in a variety of industries, including agriculture, detergents, food, nutraceuticals and biodiesels [6].
Organic solvents are used in the majority of industrial-scale synthetic processes because of their ability to alter reaction balance toward synthetic direction and ease of product recovery, higher activity and stability, stereoselectivity and regiospecificity. [7]. Therefore, searching for organic solvent tolerance lipase is very important. Tolerance on organic solvents is positively correlated with thermostability [8]. These two characteristics make lipase can be fulfilled as industrial biocatalyst.
Thermostable and solvent tolerance enzymes could be obtained through protein engineering strategies in collaboration with discovery of new lipase [9]. However, protein engineering strategy requires a complete understanding of the structure of lipase using pre-characterized or commercial lipases. Hence, discovery of new lipase with both specific characteristic are important and needed to be explore. The source of a new lipases could be obtained by screening from cultivated microorganisms or metagenome approach [9–13].
Pseudomonas sp. lipase are emerging biocatalysts with thermostable and organic solvent tolerance character. Amano has marketed lipases from P. cepacia (Lipase PS) and P. fluorescens (Lipase AsK) [14]. The other widely used Pseudomonas lipase is Pseudomonas stutzeri lipase which have aminolysis and transesterification activity and also have enantiomer selectivity [15–18]. Studies of metagenomics related to P. stutzeri lipase have so far been rare.
This report investigated Lk2 and Lk3 thermostability and characterized transesterification activity in organic solvents. The enzymes are recombinant thermostable lipases isolated by metagenomic approach from domestic compost [19]. Based on homological analysis, the lipases are most closely related to P. stutzeri lipase belonging to family I.1. Both lipases have been characterized based on hydrolysis activity [13]. In Escherichia coli BL21(DE3), Lk2 and Lk3 are overexpressed and extracted as active soluble enzymes using the thermolysis technique. As the physiological and biochemical properties of Lk2 and Lk3 may differ despite being obtained from the same source, experimental and in silico analysis were carried out to probe a better understanding on molecular interactions of lipase–substrate, ion metal, and thermostability.
Materials and methods
Chemicals, plasmids and bacterial strains
Lipase genes LK2 and LK3 were obtained from our collection. The recombinant plasmid pET-30a(+)-LK2 and pET-30a(+)-LK3 were transformed into E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) (15). pET-30a (+) plasmids vector were used as an expression vector. All of the chemicals were bought from Merck (Merck, Germany) and Sigma (Sigma, Chemicals, U.S.A.).
Heterologous expression
LB medium contained kanamycin sulfate (50 g/ml) was used to cultivate E. coli BL21 (DE3) with recombinant plasmid and shaken at 150 rpm at 37°C. IPTG was added at a final concentration of 1 mM, and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 4 h when the 600 nm absorbance was 0.6–0.7. Centrifugation was employed to extract cells, which were then stored at −20°C until needed.
Membrane cell disruption by thermolysis
By adding 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), The cells were resuspended in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) and incubated for 30 min at 50°C. After centrifuging the mixture for 30 min at 11900 g, the supernatant was recovered. To avoid denaturation, the supernatant was settled with a 30 mM K2HPO4 buffer.
SDS–PAGE and zimography
SDS-PAGE was done at 110 V on a 12% running gel with SDS running buffer. Protein bands were visualized by using 0.1% Commasie Brilliant Blue to stain the gel. The purified enzyme’s molecular mass was calculated using Protein marker III (pre-stained), peqGOLD Protein Ladder. The polyacrylamide gel-embedded lipase was renaturated with 50 ml of sodium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 8) containing 0.1% tritone overnight in preparation for the zymographic examination. Subsequently, 1-naphthalene laurate was incubated with lipase in 50 ml sodium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 8) at 50°C for 4 h. By adding 25 mg of fast blue dye, the staining activity was performed.
Purification of recombinant lipase
Ni-NTA agarose matrix (1.5 ml) on column was balanced with 12 ml miliQ water, After that, 15 ml PBS 50 mM at pH of 8 (1% (V/V) Triton-X 100, 100 mM NaCl) were added. The recombinant enzymes were collected on a column after the thermolysis stage. Then, the column washed with PBS 50 mM at pH of 8 contained 100 mM NaCl. The elution buffer was used to elute the bound recombinant enzymes (50 mM PBS pH 8, 300 mM NaCl, imidazole 100 mM). The elution fraction was dialyzed overnight used PBS buffer pH 8 at 4°C to remove any remaining SDS and imidazole. The recombinant enzyme was then concentrated using diafiltration (Merck Millipore). Using the Bradford technique and a bovine serum albumin standard, the amount of protein in the sample was determined [20]. The concentrated enzymes were used for transesterification assay.
Transesterification activity assay
Transesterification activity of recombinant lipase Lk2 and Lk3 were measured using Pohnlein method with slight modification [21]. Transesterification was performed between methyl esters and para-nitrophenol in organic solvents at various temperature. The conversion of para-nitrophenol into para-nitrophenyl esters was monitored through decreasing absorbance at 400 nm. The reaction procedures as followed: 10 µl concentrated recombinant lipase was mixed with 990 µl organic solvents (contained 4 mM pNP and 24 mM methyl esters). In a 2 ml reaction tube, the reaction was carried out for 10 min at 150 rpm. Enzymes precipitation were done by centrifuged the tube at 11,900 g for 3 min, then 50 µl of the upper layer was removed and mixed with 1 ml of Tris Cl buffer pH7 (0.1 percent triton). UV-Vis spectrophotometry was used to measure the remaining pNP (Genesis 10S UV-Vis, Thermo Scientific). The amount of enzyme that released one mole of p-nitrophenyl ester in 1 min was defined as one enzymatic unit. All of the tests were carried out in triplicate, including the blanks (without the addition of enzymes).
Purified recombinant lipase characterization
Substrate and solvent specificity determination
Various methyl esters were used to test substrate specificity (varying fatty acids carbon chain length): laurate (C12), myristate (C14), palmitate (C16), stearate (C18), oleate (C18:1) and linoleate (C18:1) (C18:2). Various organic solvents, such as n-hexane, acetone and acetonitrile, were used to test the solvent specificity.
Temperature’s effect
Shaking at 150 rpm for 10 min in n-hexane with 4 mM p-nitrophenol and 24 mM methyl palmitate as the substrate at various temperatures (35, 40, 45, 50, 55 and 60°C) determined the optimum temperature for transesterification activity. The pure recombinant lipase was pre-incubated at temperatures (50 and 55°C) for 24 h for stability experiments, with residual activity measured every 2 h. At 0 h, the activity level was recorded as 100%.
Determination of kinetic parameters
Bisubstrate kinetics were determined at different concentrations of methyl esters and pNP using n-hexane as a solvent at the optimal temperature of each lipase. The concentrations of pNP ranged from 0.6 to 4 mM and methyl ester from 3 to 24 mM. The Km and Vmax values were calculated from the Lineweaver–Burk linear regression plot. The kcat values were calculated by dividing the Vmax by the lipase concentration of the reaction mixture.
Metal ions effect
After 30 min incubation of pure recombinant lipase in the presence of 5 mM ZnCl2, NiCl2, FeCl3 and CaCl2, the residual activities were measured to investigated the influence of metal ions on transesterification activity. The activity obtained in the absence of metal ions was taken to be 100%.
Modeling structure and docking
Homology modeling was used to construct 3D protein structures using AlphaFold2 (https://colab.research.google.com/github/sokrypton/ColabFold/blob/main/AlphaFold2.ipynb) [22]. Validation of the resulting structure based on the Ramachandran plot using MolProbity [23]. Protein minimization was not performed to prevent amino acid residues from being present in the dissallowed area on the basis of the Ramachandran plot [24]. PubChem data were used to create the ligand structure (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) [25]. The ligand was then minimized by using Orca [26] and recorded as PDB with the Avogadro software [27]. Flexible docking was performed using Autodock Vina [28]. Three catalytic and two oxyanion holes residues were set as flexible, while enzymes without these five flexible residues were set as rigid receptors. Preparation for docking and grid determination were carried out by Autodock MGLTools-1.5.6 [29]. Polar hydrogen and Kollman charges were added to the enzymes structure, while Gastaiger charges were computed for the ligand. Grid dimension covered conserved region and oxyanion hole. Grid spacing was kept at 1 Å. Docking visualization using Pymol and Ligplot [30,31]. PLIP server is used to analyze protein–ligand interactions (https://plip-tool.biotec.tu-dresden.de/plip-web/plip/index) [32].
Substrate binding area
The possible binding pockets for the 3D structure of Lk2 and Lk3 were predicted using Castp’s online server (http://sts.bioe.uic.edu/castp/calculation.html). The CASTp algorithm calculates the size and volume of projected pockets [33].
Solvent preference
Solvent preference was confirmed by dynamic molecular simulation using structure minimization in various organic solvents. This is accomplished by defining minimization using the implicit mode (implicit solvent calculations Born generalized parallel with NAMD) [34]. The GBIS model treats polar solvent as a dielectric continuum and screens electrostatic interactions between solute atoms as a result. A total of 40,000 minimization steps were performed with VMD plugin QwikMD [34]. 3D protein structure was dissolved and minimize on various organic solvents (n-hexane, acetone and acetonitrile). The adjustment of the solvent dielectric constant was carried out manually in the configuration file.
Structure stability
The SCooP algorithm, a Gibbs–Helmholtz equation-based program that predicts protein stability assuming monomeric proteins and a two-state folding transition, was used to derive temperature-dependent protein stability predictions (http://babylone.ulb.ac.be/SCooP) [35]. Protein stability prediction is also analyzed by calculated hydrophobic cluster, hydrogen bond and salt bridge using ProteinTools website (https://proteintools.uni-bayreuth.de.) [36].
Metal ion binding
Binding potential prediction analysis for protein–metal ion were performed by uploaded .pdb file to the Metal Ion Binding servers (http://bioinfo.cmu.edu.tw/MIB/) [37].
Results and discussions
Lk2 and Lk3 expression and purification in E. coli
Heterologous expression of lipase LK2 and LK3 genes were carried out by induction with 1 mM IPTG. The proteins were fused with his tag to assist for purification. Cells were lysed by thermolysis method following addition of 0.1% SDS to obtain soluble protein. Following SDS-PAGE analysis, Lk2 and Lk3 were expressed at size around 32 and 31 kDa, respectively (Figure 1A). The proteins still showed lipolytic activity following zymography using naphtyl laurate as substrate (Figure 1B).
Profile SDS-PAGE Lk2 and Lk3 of the purified protein
IMAC Ni NTA purifications was used to purify the proteins. The purified proteins still shows lipolytic activity. The specific activity of purified Lk2 and Lk3 increased 13 and 12 times compared with that of the crude extracts, respectively (Table 1). Lk2 exhibit higher activity compared with that of Lk3.
. | Total protein (mg) . | Total activity (U) . | Spesific activity (U/mg) . | Purification fold . | Yield (%) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C E Lk2 | 12.55 | 19.54 | 1.56 | 1 | 100 |
Purified Lk2 | 0.41 | 7.72 | 20.64 | 13.25 | 39.50 |
C E Lk3 | 14.47 | 20.15 | 1.48 | 1 | 100 |
Purified Lk3 | 0.82 | 14.33 | 17.50 | 11.85 | 71.13 |
. | Total protein (mg) . | Total activity (U) . | Spesific activity (U/mg) . | Purification fold . | Yield (%) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
C E Lk2 | 12.55 | 19.54 | 1.56 | 1 | 100 |
Purified Lk2 | 0.41 | 7.72 | 20.64 | 13.25 | 39.50 |
C E Lk3 | 14.47 | 20.15 | 1.48 | 1 | 100 |
Purified Lk3 | 0.82 | 14.33 | 17.50 | 11.85 | 71.13 |
U = Unit activity was defined as 1 μmol pNP decreased during reaction per min at 50°C. Methyl palmitate and p-nitrophenol was used as substrates in acetone.
CE = crude extract.
Lk2 and Lk3 substrate preference
Lipases are enzymes that are unique to a certain sort of substrate, such as carbon length [38] or a substrate with double bonds in a specific location [39]. The oxyanion hole of P. stutzeri lipase (Lk4) was mutated at H110F, which resulted in a shift toward a substrate with a longer carbon chain [40]. Lk2 and Lk3 activity’s were investigated on various methyl ester (C12-C18) and C18 containing double bonds (C18:1, C18:2). The results showed that Lk2 activity was higher than Lk3 activity in each of the substrates tested (C12-C18, C18:1, C18:2). Furthermore, Lk2 preferred C18:1 methyl oleate and Lk3 has similar preference for a range of substrates (Figure 2).
Specific activity of purified protein on variation of long carbon chain substrates
Lk2 and Lk3 are high homology with percent identical at 89%. Characterization of the structural models by alphafold2 showed that the closest homology to both lipases was the open lid structure of P. aeruginosa lipase with PDB ID: 1ex9 (Figure 3).
Structure similarity of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipase (1ex9) with Lk2 and Lk3
Both enzymes contains same catalytic triad, however, the geometry and catalytic pocket might different. Although the architecture of the catalytic triad is substantially conserved, the great diversity in the catalytic pocket region may result in varied substrate specificity [41].
Further characterization based on computational analysis showed that catalytic pocket volume of Lk2 is larger compared with that of Lk3 (Figure 4). This might due to the activity of Lk2 is higher compared with that of Lk3.
Binding pockets and cavities
On longer carbon chain of substrated up to C18, the activity of the enzyme tends to be more higher compared with that of Lk3. Moreover docking analysis result appeared in agreement with experimental data (Table 2).
. | . | Affinity1 (kcal/mol) . | Hydrophobic interaction2 . | Hydrogen bond3 . | Salt bridge4 . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | . | Residue involved . | Residue involved . |
Methyl laurate (12:0) | Lk2 | −5.3 | 8 | M19 and S85 | H253 |
Lk3 | --4.6 | 8 | S78 | H246 | |
Methyl miristate (14:0) | Lk2 | −5.2 | 4 | M19 and S85 | H253 |
Lk3 | --4.7 | 7 | – | H246 | |
Methyl palmitate (16:0) | Lk2 | −5.3 | 5 | M19 and S85 | H253 |
Lk3 | --4.8 | 8 | S78 | H246 | |
Methyl stearate (18:0) | Lk2 | −5.4 | 8 | S85 | H253 |
Lk3 | --5.3 | 6 | S78 | H246 | |
Methyl oleate (18:1) | Lk2 | −5.7 | 8 | M19 and S85 | H253 |
Lk3 | --5.1 | 7 | – | H246 | |
Methyl linoleate (18:2) | Lk2 | −5.7 | 8 | S85 | H253 |
Lk3 | --5.1 | 8 | S78 | H246 |
. | . | Affinity1 (kcal/mol) . | Hydrophobic interaction2 . | Hydrogen bond3 . | Salt bridge4 . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | . | . | Residue involved . | Residue involved . |
Methyl laurate (12:0) | Lk2 | −5.3 | 8 | M19 and S85 | H253 |
Lk3 | --4.6 | 8 | S78 | H246 | |
Methyl miristate (14:0) | Lk2 | −5.2 | 4 | M19 and S85 | H253 |
Lk3 | --4.7 | 7 | – | H246 | |
Methyl palmitate (16:0) | Lk2 | −5.3 | 5 | M19 and S85 | H253 |
Lk3 | --4.8 | 8 | S78 | H246 | |
Methyl stearate (18:0) | Lk2 | −5.4 | 8 | S85 | H253 |
Lk3 | --5.3 | 6 | S78 | H246 | |
Methyl oleate (18:1) | Lk2 | −5.7 | 8 | M19 and S85 | H253 |
Lk3 | --5.1 | 7 | – | H246 | |
Methyl linoleate (18:2) | Lk2 | −5.7 | 8 | S85 | H253 |
Lk3 | --5.1 | 8 | S78 | H246 |
Affinity energy was calculated by Autodock Vina.
2,3,4Substrate-enzyme interaction was generated by PLIP program.
M19 is one of oxyanion hole of Lk2; S85 and H253 are catalytic residues of Lk2. S78 and H246 are catalytic residues of Lk3.
Based on affinity energy and hydrogen bond interaction between substrate and the enzymes showed that Lk2 appeared to have the best interaction with methyl oleate (C18:1) as ligand. Eventhough, the affinity energy of the C18:1 is slightly lower compared with that of C18:2, hydrogen interaction occurred with Met19 and S85 on C18:1 while on C18:2, the hydrogen interaction only occurred with S85. Met19 and S85 are known as one of oxyanion hole and catalytic triad on Lk2, respectively [19]. Comparison between interaction of C18:1 and C18:2 to Lk2 appeared that methyl oleate interacted with Met19 and Ser85, while methyl linoleate only interacted with Ser85 (Table 2). The interaction distance between methyl oleate and Ser85 is longer compared with that of methyl linoleate to Ser85 (Figure 5A). Meanwhile for Lk3, C18:2 was appeared as best ligand (Table 2). Eventhough, the affinity energy of C18 is slightly higher compared with that of C18:2; however, hydrogen bond distance between C18:2 to Ser78 (0.16 Å) is shorter compared with that of the C18 to Ser78 (0.18 Å) (Figure 5B). Ser78 is one of catalytic triad on Lk3. Close orientation of catalytic triad to the substrate might cause better interaction and hence increase the activity. All of the computational results are in agreement with the experiment.
Enzyme–substrate interaction
The influence of organic solvents on Lk2 and Lk3 activity
Activity of enzyme on variation of organic solvents
The highest activity was on n-hexane. The relative activity was decreased up to 80% on acetonitrile compared with that of n-hexane, moreover on acetone the enzymes exhibited 50% activity. Similar result was reported for Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase [43]. Some lipases were reported to lose its activity on acetone [21]. The stability of some enzymes on organic solvent was considered to have positive correlation with thermal stability [44]. At high temperatures, the structure of lipase becomes more compact and is retained on native folding in non-polar solvents [45]. Study on the lid movements of P. stutzeri lipase (LipC) in water and THF showed that the lid opened wider on THF resulting of catalytic residue of serine exposed on medium [46]. Moreover, molecular dynamics simulation of LipMNK showed unfolded lipase structure on acetonitrile concentration at 80–100% [47]. The highest activity of Lk2 and Lk3 on n-hexane might due to the structure of the enzymes were keep on native folding, while on acetonitrile the structure of enzymes might be unfolded. To probe the above possibilities molecular dynamic simulation was carried out on both Lk2 and Lk3. The result showed that protein–solvent interactions were much stronger on more polar solvents (Figure 7A) in both Lk2 and Lk3 resulting on longer of radius gyration of proteins (Figure 7B).
Molecular dynamics simulations based on the NAMD program
Better interaction of solvent to protein might cause denaturation or conformation change of protein and hence reduce the activity. Previous research showed that the compact 3D structure of proteins in non-polar solvents maintained the conformation of active site [48]. The hydrogen bonding between OG (Ser)-NE2 (His) and OD2 (Asp)-ND1 (His), according to the lipase catalytic mechanism, was critical for the transition state’s stabilization [49]. On Lk2, hydrogen bond distance between OG (Ser85)-NE2 (His246) and OD2 (Asp231)-ND1 (His246) is closer in n-hexane (4.8 and 6.1 Å) compared with both in acetone and acetonitrile (5 and 6.2 Å) (Figure 8). This suggested that in n-hexane the enzymes maintained the conformation of the catalytic center as native structure.
Orientation of triad catalytic residues (Ser, His, Asp) on catalytic center of Lk2
Optimum temperature and thermal stability of Lk2 and Lk3
Optimum temperature of Lk2 and Lk3 were assayed using methyl palmitate as substrate. The reactions were measured at variation of temperature range from 35 to 60°C. Lk2 and Lk3 showed temperature optimum at 50 and 55°C, respectively (Figure 9A). Most of lipases from thermophilic or thermotolerant bacteria appeared optimum lipolytic activity range at 50–70°C [15,50,51].
Optimum temperature and thermostability
Lk2 and Lk3 were tested for thermostability at 50 and 55°C, respectively. The reaction was carried out using n-hexane with three different substrates (methyl laurate, methyl oleate and methyl linoleate). After 2 h of incubation at 50°C, Lk2 activity increased by 1.2- and 1.6-fold each with methyl linoleate and methyl oleate. There is no increasing activity when Lk2 incubated at 55°C. After 24 h of incubation at 50 and 55°C, the highest Lk2 activity was observed on the methyl laurate substrate in comparison with methyl oleate and methyl linoleate (Figure 9B). Meanwhile, after 2 h incubation at 50 and 55°C, Lk3 activity increased 1.2- and 1.6-fold with methyl linoleate. After a 24 h incubation period, the highest activity of Lk3 remained approximately 80% with methyl linoleate (Figure 9C).
. | ΔHm (kcal/mol) . | ΔCp (kcal/mol K) . | Tm (°C) . | ΔGr (kcal/mol) . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lk2 | −163.4 | −2.81 | 70.6 | --12.8 |
Lk3 | --166.6 | --2.25 | 72.6 | −15.2 |
. | ΔHm (kcal/mol) . | ΔCp (kcal/mol K) . | Tm (°C) . | ΔGr (kcal/mol) . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lk2 | −163.4 | −2.81 | 70.6 | --12.8 |
Lk3 | --166.6 | --2.25 | 72.6 | −15.2 |
Tm = melting temperature.
ΔHm = the standard folding enthalpy measured at Tm.
ΔCp = the standard folding heat capacity.
ΔGr = folding free energy value at room temperature.
There are many factors influenced on thermostability of protein such as hydrophobic cluster, salt bridge and hydrogen interactions [52–54]. Structure prediction analysis of Lk2 and Lk3 showed that Lk3 contains more hydrophobic cluster and hydrogen bond interaction compared with that of Lk2, respectively (Table 4). All of the in silico data is agreement with the experiment that Lk3 is more thermostable compared with that of Lk2.
Kinetics constants
The constant Michaelis (Km) and the Vmax were determined from the Lineweaver–Burk double reciprocal plot. These transesterification kinetics were bisubstrate between methyl oleate and p-nitrophenol and also methyl linoleate and p-nitrophenol (Table 5).
Lipase . | Substrates . | Vmax (U/mg) . | KM ester (mM) . | Kcat s−1 . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lk2 | Methyl oleate and pNP | 148.38 | 10.29 | 81.61 |
Methyl linoleate and pNP | 114.99 | 40.56 | 63.25 | |
Lk3 | Methyl oleate and pNP | 36.09 | 13.42 | 18.65 |
Methyl linoleate and pNP | 43.79 | 11.11 | 22.62 |
Lipase . | Substrates . | Vmax (U/mg) . | KM ester (mM) . | Kcat s−1 . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lk2 | Methyl oleate and pNP | 148.38 | 10.29 | 81.61 |
Methyl linoleate and pNP | 114.99 | 40.56 | 63.25 | |
Lk3 | Methyl oleate and pNP | 36.09 | 13.42 | 18.65 |
Methyl linoleate and pNP | 43.79 | 11.11 | 22.62 |
Lineweaver−Burk double-reciprocal plots
The Km values for the Bulkholderia cepacia lipase were 580 mM with triolein and ethanol as substrates. Commercial lipase Novozyme 435 displayed Km values of 29 mM with waste cooking oil and ethanol as substrates. The Km and Vmax values for Candida antartica lipase A using soybean oil and methanol as substrates were 481 mM and 68.5 U/min. All these enzymes also have ping-pong Bi–Bi mechanisms as kinetics mechanism [57–59].
Metal ions’ effect on Lk2 and Lk3 activity
The activity of most enzyme is influenced by the present of metal ion, some of the ions increase the activity [60], some of them inhibit the activity [61]. Lipase family I.1 are known as Ca2+ dependent enzyme [3], the presence of Ca2+ enhanced the enzyme’s activity considerably. The enzymes contain a conserved region to bind Ca2+. In the presence of a variety of metal ions, the enzymes were studied to see how they affected Lk2 and Lk3 activity. Ca2+ and Zn2+ were shown to inhibit Lk2, while the present of Fe3+ and Ni2+ increased the activity of the enzyme (Figure 11). The same effect was also exhibited on the activity of Lk3 except for the present of Zn2+. The activity of both lipases is slightly affected by EDTA added at a concentration of 1 and 5 mM. Activation and deactivation of both lipases were dose dependent. All metal ion variations and EDTA inhibited lipase activity at a concentration of 10 mM. Increasing the activity of same lipases on the present of Fe3+ were reported on Geobacillus sp. TW1 lipase [62] and lipase from P. aeruginosa [63]. Previous report proposes that redox-inert metal ions tend to stabilize negative charge on the enzyme and activating substrate, while the redox active ions might play a role as Lewis acids and as redox centers [64].
Activity of enzyme on various different metal ions
Deactivating of Lk2 and Lk3 activities in the present of Ca2+ were surprising since Lk2 and Lk3 were belonged to Family I.1 known as Ca2+-dependent enzyme. In the present of Ca2+, interaction between Ca2+ and amino acid residues close to histidine (one of triad catalytic) contributed to keep His at proper orientation in the catalytic center (His loop) and hence activating the enzyme [65]. Conformation or orientation of triad catalytic residues on active center of P. aeruginosa lipase was analysed. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipase was used as model enzyme from family I.1 lipase. The result showed that the distance of Ser85-His251 and His251-Asp229 are 2.3 and 3.2, respectively. Moreover, the distance between Ca2+-amino acid residues is within 2.2 and 2.4 Å (Figure 12). Analysis on the interaction between Ca2+-amino acid residues on Lk2 and Lk3 showed that the interaction distance was longer compared with that of interaction on P. aeruginosa lipase (Figure 12). The phenomenon affected orientation of Histidine on active center becoming improper (Figure 13). The distance between Ser85-His253 and His253-Asp231 in Lk2 were 4.2 and 3.9 Å, respectively. Moreover the distance between Ser78-His246 and His246-Asp224 on Lk3 were 3.0 and 4.5 Å, respectively. Orientation shift on catalytic residue of Lk2 and Lk3 caused dramatically decreased on the activity of Lk2 and Lk3. Several previous studies of lipase from metagenomics isolation appeared to have different properties from their related family [66–69]. The above data suggested that Lk2 and Lk3 are unique or novel lipase on family I.1.
Calcium binding residues and catalytic triad of P. aeruginosa lipase (model enzyme for Family I.1 lipase) generated by Pymol program
Calcium binding orientation
Conclusion
Transesterification activity of Lk2 and Lk3 on various organic solvents was successfully characterized. Lk2 exhibited higher activity compared with that of Lk3 in various carbon length, C12-C18, C18:1 and C18:2. 3D structure prediction of Lk2 contained larger catalytic pocket compared with that of Lk3. Most preference substrate of Lk2 was methyl oleate (C18:1), while for Lk3, the highest activity was appeared on methyl linoleate (C18:2). The preference of substrate on Lk2 and Lk3 were confirmed by computational analysis. The activity of both Lk2 and Lk3 was preferentially increased when a nonpolar organic solvent was present. The enzyme–solvent interaction in n-hexane was weaker than in acetone or acetonitrile. Lk2 was less thermostable compared with that of Lk3. The folding parameter of Lk3 showed that the enzyme is more compact. The activity of both enzymes were activated by the present of Fe3+; however, in the present of Ca2+ the activity were inhibited. This is contradictive for lipase from family I.1, known as Ca2+ dependent enzyme, suggesting that Lk2 and Lk3 are novel lipase on family I.1.
Data Availability
Lipase gene LK2 and LK3 available in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) with accession number of KP204884 and KP204885. All data generated or analyzed during the present study are included in this article and supplementary file.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by SIMLITABMAS PDUPT research project program, Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education [grant number 5E/IT1.C02/TA.00/2022] and SIMLITABMAS PDD doctoral research project program, Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education [grant number 2/E1/KPPTNBH/2021].
CRediT Author Contribution
Titin Haryati: Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. Made Puspasari Widhiastuty: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Validation, Investigation, Project administration, Writing—review & editing. Fida Madayanti Warganegara: Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing—review & editing. Akhmaloka Akhmaloka: Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Project administration, Writing—review & editing.