Modification of proteins by ubiquitin is a highly regulated process that plays a critical role in eukaryotes, from the construction of signalling platforms to the control of cell division. Aberrations in ubiquitin transfer are associated with many diseases, including cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. The ubiquitin machinery generates a rich code on substrate proteins, spanning from single ubiquitin modifications to polyubiquitin chains with diverse linkage types. Central to this process are the E2 enzymes, which often determine the exact nature of the ubiquitin code. The focus of this mini-review is on the molecular details of how E2 enzymes can initiate and grow ubiquitin chains. In particular, recent developments and biochemical breakthroughs that help explain how the degradative E2 enzymes, Ube2s, Ube2k, and Ube2r, generate complex ubiquitin chains with exquisite specificity will be discussed.

The post-translational modification of proteins by ubiquitin is involved in most cellular processes. The ubiquitin system is most well-known for its role in managing protein degradation [1], however ubiquitin transfer (ubiquitylation) has extensive non-proteolytic roles including the recruitment of signalling complexes [2], and regulating the cellular localisation of proteins [3]. Proteins can be modified by single ubiquitin moieties or by polyubiquitin chains of eight different linkages [4]. Attachment of ubiquitin involves a cascade of three families of proteins. Humans have two E1, ∼40 E2, and >600 E3 ligase enzymes which sequentially activate, conjugate, and covalently link ubiquitin to a primary amine — typically a lysine (Lys) — in a protein substrate (Figure 1A). In parallel there are 10+ ubiquitin-like modifiers, which are also integral to cellular function [5]. Together the ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like cascade modifies an enormous range of substrate proteins and thereby directs their fate.

Overview of chain initiating and chain elongating E2 enzymes.

Figure 1.
Overview of chain initiating and chain elongating E2 enzymes.

(A) E2 enzymes are charged with ubiquitin by a ubiquitin activating E1 enzyme. The resulting E2∼Ub conjugate is usually activated by interacting with an E3 ligase (indicated as RING) that promotes ubiquitin transfer. For initiating E2 enzymes, they add a single ubiquitin molecule or short chains to substrate proteins. (B) Chain elongating E2 enzymes add particular ubiquitin chains to the initiating ubiquitin marks (i.e.: use ubiquitin as a substrate) and these signals enhance the downstream effect on the substrate protein.

Figure 1.
Overview of chain initiating and chain elongating E2 enzymes.

(A) E2 enzymes are charged with ubiquitin by a ubiquitin activating E1 enzyme. The resulting E2∼Ub conjugate is usually activated by interacting with an E3 ligase (indicated as RING) that promotes ubiquitin transfer. For initiating E2 enzymes, they add a single ubiquitin molecule or short chains to substrate proteins. (B) Chain elongating E2 enzymes add particular ubiquitin chains to the initiating ubiquitin marks (i.e.: use ubiquitin as a substrate) and these signals enhance the downstream effect on the substrate protein.

Close modal

The ubiquitin code is diverse, and recent publications have highlighted how complicated and intertwined ubiquitin modification can be (e.g.: [6–12]). While Lys48-linked ubiquitin chains have long been known to result in degradation of the attached substrate protein by the proteasome [13], and this process is an essential part of recycling of misfolded proteins, maintenance of protein homeostasis, and control of the cell cycle [14], Lys11-linked ubiquitin chains are also strongly associated with degradation by the proteasome [15,16]. However, it is becoming clearer that branched (or heterotypic) ubiquitin chains form an integral part of the ubiquitin code [17] (Figure 1B). For example, branched chains were recently shown to result in efficient degradation of the cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 1 (cIAP1) protein, while the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC) generates oxyester-linked branches off of linear ubiquitin chains [6,11]. Indeed, branched ubiquitin chains can amplify — or alter — the response of the cell to the ubiquitin signal [6,16–22].

All E2 enzymes contain a catalytic domain called a ubiquitin conjugating (UBC) domain [23]. Many E2 enzymes contain only a UBC domain, while others contain additional N- or C-terminal extensions (or both) that play roles in regulating processivity or binding to other proteins like E3 ligases or substrate proteins (Figure 2). In the cell, E2 enzymes will normally be conjugated to ubiquitin where the catalytic Cys of the E2 enzyme is linked to the C terminus of ubiquitin by a thioester bond [24] (denoted E2∼Ub where ∼ indicates a thioester bond between ubiquitin and the active site Cys of an E2 enzyme). In the absence of an E3 ligase, the ubiquitin molecule in these E2∼Ub conjugates tends to occupy multiple catalytically inactive positions [25]. While some E2 enzymes can promote ubiquitin transfer in the absence of an E3 ligase, the reaction is dramatically accelerated by specific interactions with an E3 ligase. This is because when an E2∼Ub conjugate is bound by a Really Interesting New Gene (RING) E3 ligase, an interaction between ubiquitin and alpha-helix 2 of the E2 enzyme (Figure 2B) locks ubiquitin in a position so it is primed for catalysis [26–35]. This arrangement of the E2∼Ub conjugate is referred to as the ‘closed conformation’. For RING-catalysed ubiquitin transfer, the E2 enzyme typically determines the exact nature of the ubiquitin code.

Structure of Ube2s, Ube2k, and Ube2r.

Figure 2.
Structure of Ube2s, Ube2k, and Ube2r.

(A) Domain structure of the E2 enzymes where flexible regions of the E2 enzymes are indicated with lines and domains are shown as coloured boxes. The numbers indicate the number of amino acids in the E2 enzymes. (B) Representative chain-building E2 enzyme (Ube2r; PDB 6NYO) showing the acidic insertion, C-terminal extension, and the helix-loop-helix motif in red. Alpha-helices are numbered, and the N and C terminus are indicated by N and C, respectively.

Figure 2.
Structure of Ube2s, Ube2k, and Ube2r.

(A) Domain structure of the E2 enzymes where flexible regions of the E2 enzymes are indicated with lines and domains are shown as coloured boxes. The numbers indicate the number of amino acids in the E2 enzymes. (B) Representative chain-building E2 enzyme (Ube2r; PDB 6NYO) showing the acidic insertion, C-terminal extension, and the helix-loop-helix motif in red. Alpha-helices are numbered, and the N and C terminus are indicated by N and C, respectively.

Close modal

For the formation of a substrate-attached ubiquitin chain, often a particular — and often promiscuous — E2 enzyme adds the initiating ubiquitin to the substrate protein (Figure 1A). Subsequently, another specific chain elongating E2 enzyme will build precise ubiquitin chains on these ubiquitin ‘seeds’ (Figure 1B). The act of generating a ubiquitin chain requires highly specific, but weak interactions between an incoming substrate (or acceptor) ubiquitin and an E2 enzyme. As expected for such highly efficient enzymes, the interaction between the acceptor ubiquitin and the E2 enzyme is weak and transient, with binding constants often >500 µM [36–39]. These weak interactions have hampered investigations into the precise mechanism of ubiquitin chain assembly. To circumvent this problem, multiple studies have used molecular modelling coupled with biochemistry to map the likely interaction of an incoming substrate ubiquitin molecule on the E2. Recently, however, major breakthroughs in cryogenic electron microscopy (cryoEM) and X-ray crystallography have helped these predictions considerably. In the subsequent sections, we highlight recent developments that have revealed how ubiquitin chains are formed by the chain-building E2 enzymes, Ube2s, Ube2k, and Ube2r (Figure 2).

The anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C) is a multi-subunit 1.2 MDa E3 ligase that is required for the transition from metaphase to anaphase [40–42]. The activity of the APC/C is highly regulated, and disruptions to its activity in humans can result in chromosome instability and cancer. When activated, the APC/C recruits the E2 enzyme, Ube2c, which initiates chain formation. Not only can Ube2c add priming ubiquitin molecules directly to substrates of APC/C, it will often add more than one ubiquitin to each substrate (multimonoubiquitylation), as well as short chains with varying topology [20]. In parallel with Ube2c, APC/C recruits Ube2s, which recognises the ubiquitin seeds planted by Ube2c and uses these to generate Lys11-linked ubiquitin chains. The activity of Ube2s results in densely decorated substrate proteins and this results in rapid and efficient degradation of substrates [20,43–45].

The APC/C complex contains a catalytic core including a RING E3 ligase domain, called APC11, and a cullin-like subunit, called APC2 [40]. While Ube2c binds to APC11 at the canonical RING-E2 interface, Ube2s makes distinct interactions with the APC/C. Notably, Ube2s is tethered to the APC/C via binding of a C-terminal extension of Ube2s to a groove between the APC2 and APC4 substrates of the APC/C [45–48]. Further contacts between the APC2 and the UBC domain of Ube2s precisely positions the E2 enzyme so it can catalyse transfer of ubiquitin to substrate-linked ubiquitin [46,49]. Recent work has demonstrated this unusual binding mode allows APC/C to engage both Ube2c and Ube2s simultaneously, which enables a feed-forward mechanism that ensures highly efficient ubiquitin transfer to substrates [50]. The unusual binding mechanism also allows APC/C to ‘track’ the tip, or distal end, of the Lys11 ubiquitin chain [51]. This provides an explanation for why the APC/C often appears to limit the length of the Lys11-linked ubiquitin chains to ∼six ubiquitin moieties [20,52].

Both NMR and X-ray data have been used to map the likely interface that ubiquitin uses against Ube2s when bound in the closed conformation [52,53]. Along with positioning of the donor ubiquitin, the formation of Lys11-linked chains by Ube2s is reliant on a precise interaction of the incoming acceptor ubiquitin and the active site of the E2 enzyme. Wickliffe et al. [52] showed that positioning of the acceptor ubiquitin relies predominantly on electrostatic interactions between the acceptor ubiquitin and the active site of Ube2s. Experiments demonstrated that while other Lys residues of ubiquitin could be positioned against the active site of Ube2s, these alternate arrangements were disfavoured by Ube2s. Subsequent evidence suggests that the APC11 RING subunit of the APC/C positions the incoming acceptor ubiquitin molecule adjacent to Ube2s [47,51]. It is likely that a combination of electrostatic contacts between Ube2s and ubiquitin, substrate-assisted catalysis, and external positioning of the acceptor ubiquitin by the APC/C allow Ube2s to exclusively produce Lys11-linked chains.

Ube2s appears to autoregulate its activity in a number of ways. One mechanism of regulation involves the formation of a Ube2s–Ube2s dimer that blocks the ability of the conjugated ubiquitin from binding in the activated conformation (Figure 3A) [54]. Importantly, when Ube2s is in this dimeric configuration it appears resistant to proteolytic degradation, and may form a ‘reservoir’ that can be rapidly recruited when needed by the APC/C. In parallel, Ube2s can be inhibited by autoubiquitylation of a Lys residue adjacent to the active site (+5 Lys), a feature common to many E2 enzymes (Figure 3B) [55]. Autoubiquitylation at this site blocks interaction with the E1 enzyme and could be another way of reserving a pool of Ube2s that can be recruited when needed. What remains to be established is how the ubiquitin moiety on Ube2s is removed (presumably by a deubiquitinase) to allow charging by an E1 enzyme. Finally, Welsh et al. [39] recently investigated the role of acidic residues in the C-terminal helix-loop-helix motif in Ube2s. This structurally conserved region forms part of the interaction between Ube2s and APC2 in the APC/C complex [46,47,49]. Surprisingly, site-directed mutagenesis of the helix-loop-helix region results in heightened activity of Ube2s in the absence of the APC/C [39]. Molecular dynamics and NMR data revealed that the mutated Ube2s∼Ub conjugate is more likely to occupy the closed conformation. This surprising result suggests that residues in the helix-loop-helix of Ube2s actively prevent formation of the closed conformation by trapping an alternate conformation of the E2∼Ub conjugate [39]. It may be that Ube2s suppresses ubiquitin transfer in the absence of an E3 ligase to ensure it can only be active when bound to the APC/C (Figure 3C). Together, these features of Ube2s are likely to regulate the accessibility of Ube2s to the APC/C and ensure temporal control of the proper transition to anaphase.

Regulation of Ube2s.

Figure 3.
Regulation of Ube2s.

(A) In the absence of recruitment by the APC/C E3 ligase, Ube2s can form a dimer that prevents the conjugated ubiquitin from binding Ube2s in the catalytically active closed conformation. The dimerisation blocks interaction with the E1 enzyme and Ube2s-catalysed ubiquitin transfer, including autoubiquitylation of Ube2s. (B) Ube2s can autoubiquitylate on a position five amino acids from its active site and thereby prevent Ube2s from being charged with ubiquitin by an E1 enzyme. (C) The helix-loop-helix region of Ube2s (indicated in red) has acidic residues that bind ubiquitin in a non-catalytic conformation to regulate its activity in the absence of the APC/C E3 ligase. Mutations (in yellow) that disrupt this site result in heightened activity, but decrease regulation.

Figure 3.
Regulation of Ube2s.

(A) In the absence of recruitment by the APC/C E3 ligase, Ube2s can form a dimer that prevents the conjugated ubiquitin from binding Ube2s in the catalytically active closed conformation. The dimerisation blocks interaction with the E1 enzyme and Ube2s-catalysed ubiquitin transfer, including autoubiquitylation of Ube2s. (B) Ube2s can autoubiquitylate on a position five amino acids from its active site and thereby prevent Ube2s from being charged with ubiquitin by an E1 enzyme. (C) The helix-loop-helix region of Ube2s (indicated in red) has acidic residues that bind ubiquitin in a non-catalytic conformation to regulate its activity in the absence of the APC/C E3 ligase. Mutations (in yellow) that disrupt this site result in heightened activity, but decrease regulation.

Close modal

The E2 enzyme, Ube2k (also known as HIP2 and E2-25K), is a chain-building E2 enzyme that produces only Lys48-linked ubiquitin chains [56]. C-terminal to its UBC domain Ube2k contains a ubiquitin associated (UBA) domain, which appears to be important for tethering Ube2k to substrates [10,57,58]. Changes in the activity and expression levels of Ube2k are associated with neurodegenerative disease and cancer [59–65]. Ube2k likely plays a broad role in cells by adding degradative Lys48-linked ubiquitin signals to various substrate proteins with a diverse selection of E3 ligases [32,66–68]. Recent work suggests Ube2k can also modify Lys63-linked ubiquitin chains to form branched chains, and this activity may be used to quench the Lys63-triggered signal [10,32].

Ube2k has a yeast homologue, Ubc1, which functions as a chain-extending E2 with the yeast APC/C in collaboration with a chain-initiating E2, Ubc4 (homologous to the Ube2d family of E2 enzymes) [69]. Like Ube2k, Ubc1 only produces Lys48-linked ubiquitin chains, and its activity with APC/C makes Ubc1 functionally equivalent to Ube2s. The first structure of a E2∼Ub conjugate in a closed conformation was determined for a Ubc1∼Ub conjugate in 2001 [70,71]. Furthermore, formation of Lys48-linked ubiquitin chains by Ubc1 was shown to be reliant on interactions between polar residues near its active site and the incoming substrate ubiquitin [72].

Until recently, there was no structure of a Ube2k∼Ub conjugate in the closed conformation. While us and others have reported structures of the conjugate [68,73], the ubiquitin moiety was invariably bound to a neighbouring UBA domain in the crystal structure, similar to structures of Ube2k with free ubiquitin [74,75]. However, quite recently the Huang group reported a structure of a closed Ube2k∼Ub conjugate that was cross-linked with an acceptor ubiquitin at the active site of Ube2k [32]. This elegant study revealed that the acceptor ubiquitin is positioned by extensive interactions with a surface adjacent to the active site of Ube2k, as well as by an unexpected additional binding site on the UBA domain (Figure 4A). Critical interactions include polar contacts between the side chain of Arg54 from ubiquitin and main chain carbonyl oxygen atoms of residues 124 and 125 from Ube2k. Further contacts support the earlier docked model [68], and include hydrophobic contacts between Val87 and Thr88 from Ube2k and Thr55 from the acceptor ubiquitin. This study suggested the UBA domain could act to both anchor Ube2k to an established ubiquitin chain, while also positioning the acceptor ubiquitin adjacent to the active site (Figure 4B) [32]. Indeed, the authors suggest that wild-type Ube2k may preferentially add Lys48 linkages to Lys63-linked ubiquitin chains, in support of the work by Pluska et al. [10].

Ube2k generates Lys48-linked ubiquitin chains.

Figure 4.
Ube2k generates Lys48-linked ubiquitin chains.

(A) A second interface on the UBA domain of Ube2k helps position the acceptor ubiquitin (orange) on its active site (interactions highlighted in red) so it is oriented to produce Lys48-linked ubiquitin chains. (B) The UBA domain of Ube2k appears to interact with ubiquitin chains to promote formation of extensively branched chains.

Figure 4.
Ube2k generates Lys48-linked ubiquitin chains.

(A) A second interface on the UBA domain of Ube2k helps position the acceptor ubiquitin (orange) on its active site (interactions highlighted in red) so it is oriented to produce Lys48-linked ubiquitin chains. (B) The UBA domain of Ube2k appears to interact with ubiquitin chains to promote formation of extensively branched chains.

Close modal

The Skp1-cullin-F-box (SCF) E3 ubiquitin ligases are members of the modular Cullin-RING ligase family (CRL) of E3 ligases [76,77]. The CRL E3 ligases comprise a large cullin scaffold protein that binds both an adaptor protein and a RING E3 ligase. The adaptor proteins recruit interchangeable substrate recognition proteins and together these allow the CRL E3 ligases to ubiquitylate a staggering number of substrate proteins. The substrates of the CRL family are typically marked for degradation by the proteasome. The SCF E3 ligase binds a RING E3 ligase, RING-box protein 1 (Rbx1) (or Rbx2) [78], which recruits chain initiating and chain elongating E2 enzymes [79]. For initiation, the SCF E3 ligases typically use the promiscuous Ube2d family of E2 enzymes [80] (though recently it has been shown to also use a RING-between-RING (RBR) E3 ligase, ARIH1 [81,82]) before recruiting the Ube2r family of E2 enzymes to generate Lys48-linked ubiquitin chains.

The Ube2r family of E2 enzymes contains an acidic loop adjacent to the active site and an extended tail C-terminal to the UBC domain (Figure 2). The acidic loop has been demonstrated to be important for activity, and has been shown to form contacts with Rbx1 and the donor ubiquitin [83]. The molecular details that underlie the role of both the acidic loop and the C-terminal tail of Ube2r2 were recently revealed by a crystal structure of a Ube2r2∼Ub conjugate in the presence of a small molecule inhibitor, CC0651 [84,85]. In this structure, both the acidic loop of Ube2r2 and parts of its flexible C-terminal tail were visible in the density map, and these highlighted their dual roles in promoting ubiquitin transfer [85]. Notably, the resolved acidic loop makes an ionic contact with the donor ubiquitin between Glu112 in the flexible loop and Arg74 of ubiquitin, and this is likely important to help stabilise the C-terminal tail of ubiquitin (Figure 5A). Whereas the C-terminal tail reaches around the UBC of Ube2r2 to help bridge the UBC and the donor ubiquitin. A cluster of hydrophobic residues in the C-terminal tail contact the UBC of Ube2r2 and these position Tyr190 from Ube2r2 to act as a pin to bridge the UBC and the donor ubiquitin (Figure 5A). Together, these contacts help stabilise the E2∼Ub in the closed conformation. Indeed, disruption of the hydrophobic pocket or the Tyr190-UBC interaction inhibits activity, both in the presence and absence of an E3 ligase.

Ube2r2 positions the donor ubiquitin and regulates its activity.

Figure 5.
Ube2r2 positions the donor ubiquitin and regulates its activity.

(A) The acidic loop and C-terminal domain (both in red ribbons, interactions indicated by dotted lines) of Ube2r2 can help position ubiquitin in the closed conformation (PDB 6NYO). (B) The helix-loop-helix motif (HLH, in red) on Ube2r2 appears to be important for positioning of the acceptor ubiquitin. Mutations (yellow) at this site result in a decrease in acceptor ubiquitin binding and activity.

Figure 5.
Ube2r2 positions the donor ubiquitin and regulates its activity.

(A) The acidic loop and C-terminal domain (both in red ribbons, interactions indicated by dotted lines) of Ube2r2 can help position ubiquitin in the closed conformation (PDB 6NYO). (B) The helix-loop-helix motif (HLH, in red) on Ube2r2 appears to be important for positioning of the acceptor ubiquitin. Mutations (yellow) at this site result in a decrease in acceptor ubiquitin binding and activity.

Close modal

An earlier report suggested that binding of the acceptor ubiquitin to Ube2r is reliant on a flexible loop from ubiquitin [86]. Subsequently, charge-swap experiments demonstrated that the side chain of Arg54 from the incoming acceptor ubiquitin formed a polar contact with the side chain of Asp143 from Ube2r [83]. Furthermore, it was recently reported that Phe45, Ala46, and Gly47 from the acceptor ubiquitin, as well as Tyr87, His98, and Ser138 from Ube2r2 form essential contacts that help formation of Lys48-linked ubiquitin chains [85]. Mutations to the helix-loop-helix motif of Ube2r2 were also shown to reduce the ability of the acceptor ubiquitin to bind to the E2 enzyme (Figure 5B) [39]. While the helix-loop-helix is distant from the expected acceptor ubiquitin binding site, mutations to this site may disrupt the positioning of a ‘gate loop’ adjacent to the active site. This disruption may dampen binding of the acceptor ubiquitin. Regulating the dynamics of the gate loop — which have been shown to be important for activated E2 enzymes [38,87,88] — could be important for binding the acceptor ubiquitin.

The human genome encodes ∼40 E2 enzymes, of which all are characterised by having a highly conserved UBC domain. Some E2 enzymes only add ubiquitin to substrates, others exclusively produce ubiquitin chains, while some are promiscuous and can do both. While some of these differences can be explained by motifs in addition to the UBC, it is clear that small sequence differences between E2 enzymes also underpin functional plasticity. The intricate molecular contacts between E3 ligases and E2 enzymes suggests the balance of substrate chain initiation and chain elongation can be rapidly triggered and quenched, and how this process is regulated is critical for healthy cells. While a greater understanding of this process has recently emerged from structural biology techniques including cryoEM, X-ray crystallography, chemical biology, and biochemistry, there remains much to be determined about the molecular details of ubiquitin transfer by E2 enzymes.

  • The proper functioning of the ubiquitin system is essential for eukaryotic life. Disruptions to the ubiquitin system (including E2 enzymes) is of considerable interest to researchers due to their involvement with disease.

  • For RING-catalysed ubiquitylation, the E2 enzymes determine the exact ‘language’ of the ubiquitin code. Some E2 enzymes plant the initiating ubiquitin on a substrate protein, while others build ubiquitin chains on these ‘seeds’ and these chains lead to a downstream effect like proteolytic degradation.

  • While some E2 enzymes are well investigated, there still remain many whose roles and mechanism of action are still not clear. Comprehending how E2 enzymes produce ubiquitin chains with a high degree of specificity on diverse substrates, and how they are regulated are fundamental questions that continue to be investigated.

The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

A.J.M. was supported by a Sir Charles Hercus Health Research Fellowship awarded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand.

A.J.M. and C.L.D. conceived and wrote the review.

APC

anaphase-promoting complex

CRL

Cullin-RING ligase family

RING

Really Interesting New Gene

SCF

Skp1-cullin-F-box

UBA

ubiquitin associated

UBC

ubiquitin conjugating

1
Verma
,
R.
,
Mohl
,
D.
and
Deshaies
,
R.J.
(
2020
)
Harnessing the power of proteolysis for targeted protein inactivation
.
Mol. Cell
77
,
446
460
2
Snelling
,
T.
,
Shpiro
,
N.
,
Gourlay
,
R.
,
Lamoliatte
,
F.
and
Cohen
,
P.
(
2022
)
Co-ordinated control of the ADP-heptose/ALPK1 signalling network by the E3 ligases TRAF6, TRAF2/c-IAP1 and LUBAC
.
Biochem. J.
479
,
2195
2216
3
Julier
,
A.
,
Radtke
,
V.
,
Marx
,
A.
and
Scheffner
,
M.
(
2022
)
Generation and characterization of site-specifically mono-ubiquitylated p53
.
ChemBioChem
23
,
e202100659
4
Sun
,
M.
and
Zhang
,
X.
(
2022
)
Current methodologies in protein ubiquitination characterization: from ubiquitinated protein to ubiquitin chain architecture
.
Cell Biosci.
12
,
126
5
Cappadocia
,
L.
and
Lima
,
C.D.
(
2018
)
Ubiquitin-like protein conjugation: structures, chemistry, and mechanism
.
Chem. Rev.
118
,
889
918
6
Akizuki
,
Y.
,
Morita
,
M.
,
Mori
,
Y.
,
Kaiho-Soma
,
A.
,
Dixit
,
S.
,
Endo
,
A.
et al (
2022
)
cIAP1-based degraders induce degradation via branched ubiquitin architectures
.
Nat. Chem. Biol.
,
1
12
7
Boughton
,
A.J.
,
Krueger
,
S.
and
Fushman
,
D.
(
2020
)
Branching via K11 and K48 bestows ubiquitin chains with a unique interdomain interface and enhanced affinity for proteasomal subunit Rpn1
.
Structure
28
,
29
43.e6
8
Deol
,
K.K.
,
Crowe
,
S.O.
,
Du
,
J.
,
Bisbee
,
H.A.
,
Guenette
,
R.G.
and
Strieter
,
E.R.
(
2020
)
Proteasome-bound UCH37/UCHL5 debranches ubiquitin chains to promote degradation
.
Mol. Cell
80
,
796
809.e9
9
Harris
,
L.D.
,
Le Pen
,
J.
,
Scholz
,
N.
,
Mieszczanek
,
J.
,
Vaughan
,
N.
,
Davis
,
S.
et al (
2021
)
The deubiquitinase TRABID stabilizes the K29/K48-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase HECTD1
.
J. Biol. Chem.
296
,
100246
10
Pluska
,
L.
,
Jarosch
,
E.
,
Zauber
,
H.
,
Kniss
,
A.
,
Waltho
,
A.
,
Bagola
,
K.
et al (
2021
)
The UBA domain of conjugating enzyme Ubc1/Ube2K facilitates assembly of K48/K63-branched ubiquitin chains
.
EMBO J.
40
,
e106094
11
Rodriguez Carvajal
,
A.
,
Grishkovskaya
,
I.
,
Gomez Diaz
,
C.
,
Vogel
,
A.
,
Sonn-Segev
,
A.
,
Kushwah
,
M.S.
et al (
2021
)
The linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC) generates heterotypic ubiquitin chains
.
eLife
10
,
e60660
12
Song
,
A.
,
Hazlett
,
Z.
,
Abeykoon
,
D.
,
Dortch
,
J.
,
Dillon
,
A.
,
Curtiss
,
J.
et al (
2021
)
Branched ubiquitin chain binding and deubiquitination by UCH37 facilitate proteasome clearance of stress-induced inclusions
.
eLife
10
,
e72798
13
Hochstrasser
,
M.
(
1996
)
Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation
.
Annu. Rev. Genet.
30
,
405
439
14
Rape
,
M.
(
2018
)
Ubiquitylation at the crossroads of development and disease
.
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
19
,
59
70
15
Swatek
,
K.N.
and
Komander
,
D.
(
2016
)
Ubiquitin modifications
.
Cell Res.
26
,
399
422
16
Yau
,
R.G.
,
Doerner
,
K.
,
Castellanos
,
E.R.
,
Haakonsen
,
D.L.
,
Werner
,
A.
,
Wang
,
N.
et al (
2017
)
Assembly and function of heterotypic ubiquitin chains in cell-cycle and protein quality control
.
Cell
171
,
918
933.e20
17
Haakonsen
,
D.L.
and
Rape
,
M.
(
2019
)
Branching out: improved signaling by heterotypic ubiquitin chains
.
Trends Cell Biol.
29
,
704
716
18
Kolla
,
S.
,
Ye
,
M.
,
Mark
,
K.G.
and
Rapé
,
M.
(
2022
)
Assembly and function of branched ubiquitin chains
.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
47
,
759
771
19
Liu
,
C.
,
Liu
,
W.
,
Ye
,
Y.
and
Li
,
W.
(
2017
)
Ufd2p synthesizes branched ubiquitin chains to promote the degradation of substrates modified with atypical chains
.
Nat. Commun.
8
,
14274
20
Meyer
,
H.-J.
and
Rape
,
M.
(
2014
)
Enhanced protein degradation by branched ubiquitin chains
.
Cell
157
,
910
921
21
Ohtake
,
F.
,
Tsuchiya
,
H.
,
Saeki
,
Y.
and
Tanaka
,
K.
(
2018
)
K63 ubiquitylation triggers proteasomal degradation by seeding branched ubiquitin chains
.
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
115
,
E1401
8
22
Ohtake
,
F.
,
Saeki
,
Y.
,
Ishido
,
S.
,
Kanno
,
J.
and
Tanaka
,
K.
(
2016
)
The K48-K63 branched ubiquitin chain regulates NF-κB signaling
.
Mol. Cell
64
,
251
266
23
Osborne
,
H.C.
,
Irving
,
E.
,
Forment
,
J.V.
and
Schmidt
,
C.K.
(
2021
)
E2 enzymes in genome stability: pulling the strings behind the scenes
.
Trends Cell Biol.
31
,
628
643
24
Siepmann
,
T.J.
,
Bohnsack
,
R.N.
,
Tokgöz
,
Z.
,
Baboshina
,
O.V.
and
Haas
,
A.L.
(
2003
)
Protein interactions within the N-end rule ubiquitin ligation pathway
.
J. Biol. Chem.
278
,
9448
9457
25
Stewart
,
M.D.
,
Ritterhoff
,
T.
,
Klevit
,
R.E.
and
Brzovic
,
P.S.
(
2016
)
E2 enzymes: more than just middle men
.
Cell Res.
26
,
423
440
26
Branigan
,
E.
,
Plechanovova
,
A.
,
Jaffray
,
E.G.
Naismith
,
J.H.
and
Hay
,
R.T.
(
2015
)
Structural basis for the RING-catalyzed synthesis of K63-linked ubiquitin chains
.
Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.
22
,
597
602
27
Buetow
,
L.
,
Gabrielsen
,
M.
,
Anthony
,
N.G.
,
Dou
,
H.
,
Patel
,
A.
,
Aitkenhead
,
H.
et al (
2015
)
Activation of a primed RING E3-E2–ubiquitin complex by non-covalent ubiquitin
.
Mol. Cell
58
,
297
310
28
Dou
,
H.
,
Buetow
,
L.
,
Sibbet
,
G.J.
,
Cameron
,
K.
and
Huang
,
D.T.
(
2012
)
BIRC7–E2 ubiquitin conjugate structure reveals the mechanism of ubiquitin transfer by a RING dimer
.
Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.
19
,
876
883
29
Huang
,
H.
,
Ceccarelli
,
D.F.
,
Orlicky
,
S.
,
St-Cyr
,
D.J.
,
Ziemba
,
A.
,
Garg
,
P.
et al (
2013
)
E2 enzyme inhibition by stabilization of a low-affinity interface with ubiquitin
.
Nat. Chem. Biol.
10
,
156
163
30
Koliopoulos
,
M.G.
,
Esposito
,
D.
,
Christodoulou
,
E.
,
Taylor
,
I.A.
and
Rittinger
,
K.
(
2016
)
Functional role of TRIM E3 ligase oligomerization and regulation of catalytic activity
.
EMBO J.
35
,
1204
1218
31
Middleton
,
A.J.
,
Budhidarmo
,
R.
,
Das
,
A.
,
Zhu
,
J.
,
Foglizzo
,
M.
,
Mace
,
P.D.
et al (
2017
)
The activity of TRAF RING homo- and heterodimers is regulated by zinc finger 1
.
Nat. Commun.
8
,
1788
32
Nakasone
,
M.A.
,
Majorek
,
K.A.
,
Gabrielsen
,
M.
,
Sibbet
,
G.J.
,
Smith
,
B.O.
and
Huang
,
D.T.
(
2022
)
Structure of UBE2K–Ub/E3/polyUb reveals mechanisms of K48-linked Ub chain extension
.
Nat. Chem. Biol.
18
,
422
431
33
Paluda
,
A.
,
Middleton
,
A.J.
,
Rossig
,
C.
,
Mace
,
P.D.
and
Day
,
C.L.
(
2022
)
Ubiquitin and a charged loop regulate the ubiquitin E3 ligase activity of Ark2C
.
Nat. Commun.
13
,
1181
34
Plechanovova
,
A.
,
Jaffray
,
E.G.
Tatham
,
M.H.
,
Naismith
,
J.H.
and
Hay
,
R.T.
(
2012
)
Structure of a RING E3 ligase and ubiquitin-loaded E2 primed for catalysis
.
Nature
489
,
115
120
35
Sanchez
,
J.G.
,
Chiang
,
J.J.
,
Sparrer
,
K.M.J.
,
Alam
,
S.L.
,
Chi
,
M.
,
Roganowicz
,
M.D.
et al (
2016
)
Mechanism of TRIM25 catalytic activation in the antiviral RIG-I pathway
.
Cell Rep.
16
,
1315
1325
36
Choi
,
Y.-S.
,
Lee
,
Y.-J.
,
Lee
,
S.-Y.
,
Shi
,
L.
,
Ha
,
J.-H.
,
Cheong
,
H.-K.
et al (
2015
)
Differential ubiquitin binding by the acidic loops of Ube2g1 and Ube2r1 enzymes distinguishes their Lys-48-ubiquitylation activities
.
J. Biol. Chem.
290
,
2251
2263
37
Haldeman
,
M.T.
,
Xia
,
G.
,
Kasperek
,
E.M.
and
Pickart
,
C.M.
(
1997
)
Structure and function of ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2-25K: the tail is a core-dependent activity element
.
Biochemistry
36
,
10526
10537
38
Liwocha
,
J.
,
Krist
,
D.T.
,
van der Heden van Noort
,
G.J.
,
Hansen
,
F.M.
,
Truong
,
V.H.
,
Karayel
,
O.
et al (
2021
)
Linkage-specific ubiquitin chain formation depends on a lysine hydrocarbon ruler
.
Nat. Chem. Biol.
17
,
272
279
39
Welsh
,
K.A.
,
Bolhuis
,
D.L.
,
Nederstigt
,
A.E.
,
Boyer
,
J.
,
Temple
,
B.R.S.
,
Bonacci
,
T.
et al (
2022
)
Functional conservation and divergence of the helix-turn-helix motif of E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes
.
EMBO J.
41
,
e108823
40
Bodrug
,
T.
,
Welsh
,
K.A.
,
Hinkle
,
M.
,
Emanuele
,
M.J.
and
Brown
,
N.G.
(
2021
)
Intricate regulatory mechanisms of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome and its role in chromatin regulation
.
Front. Cell Dev. Biol.
9
,
687515
41
Watson
,
E.R.
,
Brown
,
N.G.
,
Peters
,
J.-M.
,
Stark
,
H.
and
Schulman
,
B.A.
(
2019
)
Posing the APC/C E3 ubiquitin ligase to orchestrate cell division
.
Trends Cell Biol.
29
,
117
134
42
Yamano
,
H.
(
2019
)
APC/c: current understanding and future perspectives
.
F1000Res.
8
,
F1000 Faculty Rev-725
43
Bremm
,
A.
and
Komander
,
D.
(
2011
)
Emerging roles for Lys11-linked polyubiquitin in cellular regulation
.
Trends Biochem. Sci.
36
,
355
363
44
Jin
,
L.
,
Williamson
,
A.
,
Banerjee
,
S.
,
Philipp
,
I.
and
Rape
,
M.
(
2008
)
Mechanism of ubiquitin-chain formation by the human anaphase-promoting complex
.
Cell
133
,
653
665
45
Williamson
,
A.
,
Wickliffe
,
K.E.
,
Mellone
,
B.G.
,
Song
,
L.
,
Karpen
,
G.H.
and
Rape
,
M.
(
2009
)
Identification of a physiological E2 module for the human anaphase-promoting complex
.
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
106
,
18213
8
46
Brown
,
N.G.
,
VanderLinden
,
R.
,
Watson
,
E.R.
,
Weissmann
,
F.
,
Ordureau
,
A.
,
Wu
,
K.P.
et al (
2016
)
Dual RING E3 architectures regulate multiubiquitination and ubiquitin chain elongation by APC/C
.
Cell
165
,
1440
1453
47
Brown
,
N.G.
,
Watson
,
E.R.
,
Weissmann
,
F.
,
Jarvis
,
M.A.
,
VanderLinden
,
R.
,
Grace
,
C.R.
et al (
2014
)
Mechanism of polyubiquitination by human anaphase-promoting complex: RING repurposing for ubiquitin chain assembly
.
Mol. Cell
56
,
246
260
48
Wu
,
T.
,
Merbl
,
Y.
,
Huo
,
Y.
,
Gallop
,
J.L.
,
Tzur
,
A.
and
Kirschner
,
M.W.
(
2010
)
UBE2S drives elongation of K11-linked ubiquitin chains by the anaphase-promoting complex
.
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
107
,
1355
1360
49
Yamaguchi
,
M.
,
VanderLinden
,
R.
,
Weissmann
,
F.
,
Qiao
,
R.
,
Dube
,
P.
,
Brown
,
N.G.
et al (
2016
)
Cryo-EM of mitotic checkpoint complex-bound APC/C reveals reciprocal and conformational regulation of ubiquitin ligation
.
Mol. Cell
63
,
593
607
50
Martinez-Chacin
,
R.C.
,
Bodrug
,
T.
,
Bolhuis
,
D.L.
,
Kedziora
,
K.M.
,
Bonacci
,
T.
,
Ordureau
,
A.
et al (
2020
)
Ubiquitin chain-elongating enzyme UBE2S activates the RING E3 ligase APC/C for substrate priming
.
Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.
27
,
550
560
51
Kelly
,
A.
,
Wickliffe
,
K.E.
,
Song
,
L.
,
Fedrigo
,
I.
and
Rape
,
M.
(
2014
)
Ubiquitin chain elongation requires E3-dependent tracking of the emerging conjugate
.
Mol. Cell
56
,
232
245
52
Wickliffe
,
K.E.
,
Lorenz
,
S.
,
Wemmer
,
D.E.
,
Kuriyan
,
J.
and
Rape
,
M.
(
2011
)
The mechanism of linkage-specific ubiquitin chain elongation by a single-subunit E2
.
Cell
144
,
769
781
53
Lorenz
,
S.
,
Bhattacharyya
,
M.
,
Feiler
,
C.
,
Rape
,
M.
and
Kuriyan
,
J.
(
2016
)
Crystal structure of a Ube2S-ubiquitin conjugate
.
PLoS ONE
11
,
e0147550
54
Liess
,
A.K.L.
,
Kucerova
,
A.
,
Schweimer
,
K.
,
Schlesinger
,
D.
,
Dybkov
,
O.
,
Urlaub
,
H.
et al (
2020
)
Dimerization regulates the human APC/C-associated ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBE2S
.
Sci. Signal.
13
,
eaba8208
55
Liess
,
A.K.L.
,
Kucerova
,
A.
,
Schweimer
,
K.
,
Yu
,
L.
,
Roumeliotis
,
T.I.
,
Diebold
,
M.
et al (
2019
)
Autoinhibition mechanism of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBE2S by autoubiquitination
.
Structure
27
,
1195
1210.e7
56
Chen
,
Z.
and
Pickart
,
C.M.
(
1990
)
A 25-kilodalton ubiquitin carrier protein (E2) catalyzes multi-ubiquitin chain synthesis via lysine 48 of ubiquitin
.
J. Biol. Chem.
265
,
21835
21842
57
Cook
,
B.W.
,
Lacoursiere
,
R.E.
and
Shaw
,
G.S.
(
2020
)
Recruitment of ubiquitin within an E2 chain elongation complex
.
Biophys. J.
118
,
1679
1689
58
Girard
,
J.R.
,
Tenthorey
,
J.L.
and
Morgan
,
D.O.
(
2015
)
An E2 accessory domain increases affinity for the anaphase-promoting complex and ensures E2 competition
.
J. Biol. Chem.
290
,
24614
24625
59
de Pril
,
R.
,
Fischer
,
D.F.
,
Roos
,
R.A.
and
van Leeuwen
,
F.W.
(
2007
)
Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2-25K increases aggregate formation and cell death in polyglutamine diseases
.
Mol. Cell. Neurosci.
34
,
10
19
60
Djajawi
,
T.M.
,
Liu
,
L.
,
Gong
,
J.
,
Huang
,
A.S.
,
Luo
,
M.
,
Xu
,
Z.
et al (
2020
)
MARCH5 requires MTCH2 to coordinate proteasomal turnover of the MCL1:NOXA complex
.
Cell Death Differ.
27
,
2484
2499
61
Hong
,
N.H.
,
Tak
,
Y.J.
,
Rhim
,
H.
and
Kang
,
S.
(
2019
)
Hip2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme has a role in UV-induced G1/S arrest and re-entry
.
Genes Genom.
41
,
159
166
62
Kalchman
,
M.A.
,
Graham
,
R.K.
,
Xia
,
G.
,
Koide
,
H.B.
,
Hodgson
,
J.G.
,
Graham
,
K.C.
et al (
1996
)
Huntingtin is ubiquitinated and interacts with a specific ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme
.
J. Biol. Chem.
271
,
19385
19394
63
Meiklejohn
,
H.
,
Mostaid
,
M.S.
,
Luza
,
S.
,
Mancuso
,
S.G.
,
Kang
,
D.
,
Atherton
,
S.
et al (
2019
)
Blood and brain protein levels of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2K (UBE2K) are elevated in individuals with schizophrenia
.
J. Psychiatr. Res.
113
,
51
57
64
Song
,
S.
,
Kim
,
S.Y.
,
Hong
,
Y.M.
,
Jo
,
D.G.
,
Lee
,
J.Y.
,
Shim
,
S.M.
et al (
2003
)
Essential role of E2-25K/Hip-2 in mediating amyloid-beta neurotoxicity
.
Mol. Cell
12
,
553
563
65
Su
,
J.
,
Huang
,
P.
,
Qin
,
M.
,
Lu
,
Q.
,
Sang
,
X.
,
Cai
,
Y.
et al (
2018
)
Reduction of HIP2 expression causes motor function impairment and increased vulnerability to dopaminergic degeneration in Parkinson's disease models
.
Cell Death Dis.
9
,
1020
66
Christensen
,
D.E.
,
Brzovic
,
P.S.
and
Klevit
,
R.E.
(
2007
)
E2-BRCA1 RING interactions dictate synthesis of mono- or specific polyubiquitin chain linkages
.
Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.
14
,
941
948
67
Lee
,
S.-J.
,
Choi
,
J.-Y.
,
Sung
,
Y.-M.
,
Park
,
H.
,
Rhim
,
H.
and
Kang
,
S.
(
2001
)
E3 ligase activity of RING finger proteins that interact with Hip-2, a human ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme
.
FEBS Lett.
503
,
61
64
68
Middleton
,
A.J.
and
Day
,
C.L.
(
2015
)
The molecular basis of lysine 48 ubiquitin chain synthesis by Ube2K
.
Sci. Rep.
5
,
16793
69
Rodrigo-Brenni
,
M.C.
and
Morgan
,
D.O.
(
2007
)
Sequential E2s drive polyubiquitin chain assembly on APC targets
.
Cell
130
,
127
139
70
Hamilton
,
K.S.
,
Ellison
,
M.J.
,
Barber
,
K.R.
,
Williams
,
R.S.
,
Huzil
,
J.T.
,
McKenna
,
S.
et al (
2001
)
Structure of a conjugating enzyme-ubiquitin thiolester intermediate reveals a novel role for the ubiquitin tail
.
Structure
9
,
897
904
71
Merkley
,
N.
and
Shaw
,
G.S.
(
2004
)
Solution structure of the flexible class II ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc1 provides insights for polyubiquitin chain assembly
.
J. Biol. Chem.
279
,
47139
47147
72
Rodrigo-Brenni
,
M.C.
,
Foster
,
S.A.
and
Morgan
,
D.O.
(
2010
)
Catalysis of lysine 48-specific ubiquitin chain assembly by residues in E2 and ubiquitin
.
Mol. Cell
39
,
548
559
73
Cook
,
B.W.
,
Barber
,
K.R.
,
Shilton
,
B.H.
and
Shaw
,
G.S.
(
2015
)
The HIP2∼ubiquitin conjugate forms a non-compact monomeric thioester during di-ubiquitin synthesis
.
PLoS ONE
10
,
e0120318
74
Ko
,
S.
,
Kang
,
G.B.
,
Song
,
S.M.
,
Lee
,
J.G.
,
Shin
,
D.Y.
,
Yun
,
J.H.
et al (
2010
)
Structural basis of E2-25K/UBB+1 interaction leading to proteasome inhibition and neurotoxicity
.
J. Biol. Chem.
285
,
36070
36080
75
Lee
,
J.-G.
,
Youn
,
H.-S.
,
Kang
,
J.Y.
,
Park
,
S.-Y.
,
Kidera
,
A.
,
Yoo
,
Y.J.
et al (
2018
)
Crystal structure of the Ube2K/E2-25K and K48-linked di-ubiquitin complex provides structural insight into the mechanism of K48-specific ubiquitin chain synthesis
.
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
506
,
102
107
76
Harper
,
J.W.
and
Schulman
,
B.A.
(
2021
)
Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase regulatory circuits: a quarter century beyond the F-box hypothesis
.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
90
,
403
429
77
Jang
,
S.-M.
,
Redon
,
C.E.
,
Thakur
,
B.L.
,
Bahta
,
M.K.
and
Aladjem
,
M.I.
(
2020
)
Regulation of cell cycle drivers by Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases
.
Exp. Mol. Med.
52
,
1637
1651
78
Huang
,
T.
,
Li
,
J.
,
Liu
,
X.
,
Shi
,
B.
,
Li
,
S.
and
An
,
H.-X.
(
2022
)
An integrative pan-cancer analysis revealing the difference in small ring finger family of SCF E3 ubiquitin ligases
.
Front. Immunol.
13
,
968777
79
Dove
,
K.K.
,
Kemp
,
H.A.
,
Di Bona
,
K.R.
,
Reiter
,
K.H.
,
Milburn
,
L.J.
,
Camacho
,
D.
et al (
2017
)
Two functionally distinct E2/E3 pairs coordinate sequential ubiquitination of a common substrate in caenorhabditis elegans development
.
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
114
,
E6576
E6584
80
Wu
,
K.
,
Kovacev
,
J.
and
Pan
,
Z.-Q.
(
2010
)
Priming and extending: a UbcH5/Cdc34 E2 handoff mechanism for polyubiquitination on a SCF substrate
.
Mol. Cell
37
,
784
796
81
Horn-Ghetko
,
D.
,
Krist
,
D.T.
,
Prabu
,
J.R.
,
Baek
,
K.
,
Mulder
,
M.P.C.
,
Klügel
,
M.
et al (
2021
)
Ubiquitin ligation to F-box protein targets by SCF–RBR E3–E3 super-assembly
.
Nature
590
,
671
676
82
Scott
,
D.C.
,
Rhee
,
D.Y.
,
Duda
,
D.M.
,
Kelsall
,
I.R.
,
Olszewski
,
J.L.
,
Paulo
,
J.A.
et al (
2016
)
Two distinct types of E3 ligases work in unison to regulate substrate ubiquitylation
.
Cell
166
,
1198
1214.e24
83
Hill
,
S.
,
Harrison
,
J.S.
,
Lewis
,
S.M.
,
Kuhlman
,
B.
and
Kleiger
,
G.
(
2016
)
Mechanism of lysine 48 selectivity during polyubiquitin chain formation by the Ube2R1/2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme
.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
36
,
1720
1732
84
St-Cyr
,
D.
,
Ceccarelli
,
D.F.
,
Orlicky
,
S.
,
van der Sloot
,
A.M.
,
Tang
,
X.
,
Kelso
,
S.
et al (
2021
)
Identification and optimization of molecular glue compounds that inhibit a noncovalent E2 enzyme–ubiquitin complex
.
Sci. Adv.
7
,
eabi5797
85
Williams
,
K.M.
,
Qie
,
S.
,
Atkison
,
J.H.
,
Salazar-Arango
,
S.
,
Alan Diehl
,
J.
and
Olsen
,
S.K.
(
2019
)
Structural insights into E1 recognition and the ubiquitin-conjugating activity of the E2 enzyme Cdc34
.
Nat. Commun.
10
,
3296
86
Chong
,
R.A.
,
Wu
,
K.
,
Spratt
,
D.E.
,
Yang
,
Y.
,
Lee
,
C.
,
Nayak
,
J.
et al (
2014
)
Pivotal role for the ubiquitin Y59-E51 loop in lysine 48 polyubiquitination
.
Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
111
,
8434
8439
87
Jones
,
W.M.
,
Davis
,
A.G.
,
Wilson
,
R.H.
,
Elliott
,
K.L.
and
Sumner
,
I.
(
2019
)
A conserved asparagine in a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme positions the substrate for nucleophilic attack
.
J. Comput. Chem.
40
,
1969
1977
88
Rout
,
M.K.
,
Lee
,
B.L.
,
Lin
,
A.
,
Xiao
,
W.
and
Spyracopoulos
,
L.
(
2018
)
Active site gate dynamics modulate the catalytic activity of the ubiquitination enzyme E2-25K
.
Sci. Rep.
8
,
7002
This is an open access article published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).