Characterization of functionally deficient SIM2 variants found in patients with neurological phenotypes

Single-minded 2 (SIM2) is a member of the basic Helix–Loop–Helix/PER–ARNT–SIM (bHLH/PAS) family of transcription factors, which are broadly known to play important roles in development, homeostasis and cellular stress responses. These factors dimerize with a general bHLH/PAS partner protein (e.g. aryl hydrocarbon nuclear receptor translocator (ARNT) or the neuronally enriched paralog, ARNT2) to become DNA binding, functional transcription factors. This protein family is characterized by their N-terminal bHLH domain, required for DNA binding and primary dimerization, followed by a PAS domain consisting of two repeats, PAS-A and PAS-B, which function as secondary dimerization interfaces and confer partner protein specificity. Their C-terminal halves contain transcription regulatory domains (Figure 1A) [1–3]. SIM2/ARNT2 heterodimers bind to the central midline element (CME) DNA binding site to regulate gene expression [4,5]. Two isoforms of SIM2, SIM2-long (SIM2l) and SIM2-short (SIM2s), arise due to alternative splicing of the SIM2 gene, with each isoform containing a unique C-terminus [6,7]. Two transrepression domains are located in the C-terminal half of the long isoform, with the short isoform only containing one. Both SIM2l and SIM2s have shown the ability to activate or repress transcription, dependent on context [5,7–10]. Target genes and cofactors associated with SIM2 are still largely unknown.

In mice, Sim2 mRNA is expressed within the brain both during embryonic development and postnatally, indicating that Sim2 may have important neural functions [4,11,12]. The location of SIM2 within the Down syndrome critical region (DSCR) on human chromosome 21 stimulated the proposal that SIM2 may be one of the genes contributing to the complex aetiology of this condition [6,13]. Supporting this notion, studies characterizing phenotypes of transgenic mice overexpressing Sim2 reported neuronal/behavioural anomalies of reduced sensitivity to pain and anxiety-related/reduced exploratory behaviour [14,15]. Sim2 knockout mouse models revealed Sim2 to be an essential gene, with null mice dying perinatally. Interestingly, newborn Sim2 knockout pups display many structural defects, including facial dysmorphologies such as cleft palates and skeletal defects of incompletely penetrant congenital scoliosis and abnormal rib protrusions [16,17]. Sim2 KO mice also have impaired development of somatostatin and thyrotropin-releasing hormone-expressing neurons within the hypothalamus, leading to a reduction in the number of these neurons [18]. The mechanisms behind these phenotypes are yet to be elucidated, so the exact functions that Sim2 plays during normal development are unclear. Overall, Sim2 mouse models have shown that aberrant expression of Sim2 can deleteriously affect brain development and/or function.

Given the phenotypes of Sim2 KO mice, it is possible that mutations in SIM2 may be causing or contributing to human developmental disorders including intellectual disabilities, facial dysmorphologies and congenital scoliosis. Exome sequencing data from patients with intellectual disabilities revealed many non-synonymous single-nucleotide variants in the SIM2 gene. In this study, we functionally tested and characterized SIM2 variants in order to determine whether they are candidates for causing or contributing to disorders in the patients harbouring those variants. Many patient variants showed a significant reduction in the ability to activate transcription of a reporter gene. These variants were further characterized to determine the mechanism behind the deficiency in protein activity. This work has highlighted many SIM2 variants as candidates for disability causing or contributing mutations and expanded the set of amino acids that are essential for SIM2 to maintain complete function as a transcription factor.

Clinical exome sequencing data were screened to look for rare variants in the SIM2 gene. Many heterozygous, non-synonymous variants were found, and nine were selected for functional analysis based on their predicted effect on SIM2 protein function (Figure 1A, Table 1, Supplementary Table S1). All variants selected are either not present or present at low frequencies in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) database (v2.1.1) [19]. Except for the E19K variant, which was apparently mosaic in the proband and absent from the parents by trio exome sequencing, the variants were apparently heterozygous and found via proband exome sequencing, so the inheritance of the variants is unknown. The E19K variant is within the first helix of the bHLH domain and thus might disrupt DNA binding or dimerization with ARNT2. The V94M, A108T and N172I variants are within the PAS-A repeat of the PAS domain. E224K, found in three patients from two families, lies at the N-terminal border of the PAS-B repeat. W306R and V326M variants lie near the C-terminal end of the PAS-B repeat, positioned in a region known to be important for activity [20]. As the PAS domain is crucial for dimerization with ARNT2, all of these variants were logical choices for activity screening. Additionally, these variants are predicted to be probably damaging to the protein using PolyPhen-2 (Polymorphism Phenotyping v2) predictive software [21]. The R382S variant is within the nuclear localization signal (NLS) in the C-terminus of the protein. The R163X mutation introduces a premature stop codon truncating the protein in the PAS-A repeat which, therefore, is predicted to disrupt dimerization (Figure 1A). All variants are in protein-coding regions common to both the short and long isoform of SIM2. Phenotypes in common between some patients harbouring functionally deficient SIM2 alleles include intellectual disabilities, delayed speech, seizure disorders, hypotonia, dysmorphic features and scoliosis. It is worth noting that some of these patients also have mutations in other genes that may well contribute, albeit to unknown degrees, to their complex phenotypes (see Table 1, Supplementary Table S1). Expression cassettes for the short isoform of SIM2 (SIM2s) and each variant, incorporating a 2xHA-3xFLAG epitope tag (SIM2s-HF), were integrated into a set position in the genome of the T-REx293 cell line. This provided a set of stable cell lines with doxycycline-inducible expression for WT SIM2s-HF and each variant for functional characterization of each protein.

To test whether the amino acid variants change the activity of SIM2s as a transcription factor, reporter gene assays were performed using the T-REx293 stable cell lines with induced expression of WT SIM2s or patient-derived variants. SIM2s was previously shown to activate the expression of a CME-based reporter gene in vitro [5,20,22]. There was no significant change in the activity of the V94M, A108T, N172I and R382S variants compared with WT SIM2s, suggesting that these amino acids are not critical for SIM2s function as a transcription factor in this system. These variants exhibit comparable potencies to WT SIM2s so are unlikely to be causing or contributing to any human phenotypes, thus were not analyzed any further. The E19K, E224K, W306R and V326M variants all showed approximately 50% reduction in reporter gene activity when compared with the WT protein, whereas the R163X variant had near null activity (Figure 1B). Western blot showed that WT SIM2s-HAFLAG and the variants were all expressed as expected in this system after dox induction; however, the R163X variant exhibited a low level of protein expression compared with the WT protein (Figure 1C). This may be because the truncated protein is less stable than the WT protein.

To function as a transcription factor, SIM2 forms a heterodimer with ARNT2. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments were, therefore, performed to assess whether the activity-deficient variants had impaired dimerization with ARNT2. The E19K, E224K and V326M protein variants all appeared to co-immunoprecipitate ARNT2 to a similar extent to WT SIM2s, indicating that they are able to efficiently dimerize with ARNT2 (Figure 2A). In contrast, the W306R and R163X variants revealed weakened abilities to co-immunoprecipitate ARNT2 (Figure 2A,B). Due to the low level of expression of the R163X variant in the stable cell line, co-immunoprecipitations were repeated using extracts from 293T cells transiently transfected with WT or R163X expression plasmids (the latter in 5-fold excess to achieve comparable expression levels). Despite clear immunoprecipitation of R163X, a reproducible lack of ARNT2 co-immunoprecipitation was observed (Figure 2B). The weaker dimerization of W306R and R163X with ARNT2 is consistent with the decrease in activating potency of this variant, while for R163X, the weak dimerization with confounding low expression culminates in little or no activity (Figure 1B).

It has been shown previously that SIM2 is able to repress HIF1α reporter gene activity through competitive binding with their common partner factors ARNT/ARNT2 [10,20]. To investigate if any of the SIM2 variants had a reduced ability to act as a transcription repressor in this way, we assayed a reporter gene driven by the HIF1α activated hypoxia response element (HRE) (Figure 3). When HIF1α expression was induced with the hypoxia mimetic dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG), the activity of the reporter was increased as expected, confirming that HIF1α was dimerizing with ARNT/ARNT2 to form a functional transcription factor. When WT SIM2s expression was concomitantly induced with dox, the activity of the reporter was reduced to basal levels, indicating that SIM2s was competitively dimerizing with ARNT/ARNT2 to prevent HIF1α induction of the reporter. Agreeing with the immunoprecipitation data (Figure 2A,B), the E19K, E224K and V326M variants were all able to repress the HRE reporter gene to a similar extent as WT SIM2s. In contrast, the W306R and R163X variants were not able to repress HIF1α mediated reporter activity, consistent with attenuated SIM2s dimerization with ARNT/ARNT2.

SIM2 is localized to the nucleus of cells, and any change of this localization may dampen the transcriptional outputs of SIM2 [20,22,23]. Immunofluorescence was performed to determine whether any of the variants disrupted the transport of SIM2s to the nucleus. As shown in Figure 4, WT SIM2s is predominantly nuclear in T-REx293 cells. The E19K, E224K, W306R and V326M variants all show predominant nuclear localization, comparable to WT SIM2s. Therefore, altered cellular localization would not be affecting the activity of these variants. The R163X variant is expressed at a much lower level compared with WT SIM2s and also has a distinctly different localization, being distributed throughout the entire cell. This is not unexpected, as this variant is truncated before the NLS. This change in localization of R163X, additional to poor expression and minimal dimerization with ARNT2, explains the dramatically decreased activity when compared with the other attenuated SIM2s variants.

E19K is the sole variant located in the basic DNA binding region of the protein, highlighting this residue as potentially involved in SIM2s/ARNT2 dimer interaction with the DNA response element, CME. To investigate this, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments were performed by inducing expression of SIM2s WT or the E19K variant and assessing enrichment of the 6xCME response element in the pML-6xCME reporter plasmid. Significant enrichment of the 6xCME response element was observed in the WT SIM2s cell line compared with the parent cell line (Figure 5), demonstrating that SIM2s directly binds to the 6xCME response element in the reporter plasmid to activate the expression of the reporter gene. Compared with the WT protein, the E19K variant showed approximately a 50% reduction in the enrichment of the 6xCME DNA binding region. Given that E19K is not deleterious for nuclear localization (Figure 4) or dimerization with ARNT2 (Figures 2A and 3), reduced DNA binding capability is the most likely cause for decreased transcriptional activity observed for this variant.

Given that no X-ray crystal structure is available for the SIM2 : ARNT2 : DNA complex, a homology model was created to better understand the atomic details regarding the variants analyzed in this study. The model was based on the mouse HIF2α : ARNT : DNA bHLH/PAS-A/PAS-B co-crystal structure (PDB 4ZPK), as HIF2α is the most closely related bHLH/PAS factor to SIM2 with a solved crystal structure [24]. We created a wildtype model that closely mimicked chain lengths, and also modelled mutations for E19K, E224K, W306R and V326M (Figure 6A). All mutations except V326M change the charge of the amino acid, indicating that these substitutions may alter the charge state within the local vicinity of the position, likely interfering with intramolecular interactions and/or the interaction energy between subunits of the dimer. The Trp to Arg mutation of SIM2 at position 306 is found at the SIM2 : ARNT2 dimer interface between the PAS-A and PAS-B domains, at an identical position to HIF2α Trp318 in the HIF2α : ARNT crystal structure (Figure 6B,C). Within the SIM2 PAS-B domain, Trp306 likely makes hydrophobic interactions (and potentially pi–pi stacking in a dynamic environment) with Tyr294 and also with Leu332, which itself makes hydrophobic interactions with Tyr294. Together, these residuesform a small hydrophobic cluster. This cluster is likely to form favourable inter-domain hydrophobic interactions Ile238 and Val279 of ARNT2 PAS-A. Mutation of Trp306 to Arg would disrupt interdomain hydrophobic interactions and likely perturb interactions between SIM2 Tyr294 and Leu332 by (1) altering charge at the interface and (2) sterically affecting interface conformation (Figure 6C,D). The E19K mutation disrupts charge complementarity at the dimer interface close to the DNA binding surface, abrogating a potential salt bridge between Glu19 of SIM2 and Arg107 of ARNT2 and destabilization of helical secondary structure (Figure 6E). This provides an explanation for the observed weakened affinity for DNA and deficient activity. Mutation E224K located on the PAS-A/B loop also disrupts the charge adjacent to the interface (Figure 6F). However, it is difficult to make accurate predictions regarding the effect of E224K, as like the crystal structure, the model is missing many residues from the ARNT2 PAS-A domain. The V326M mutation is found on the PAS-B β-sheet directly opposing the PAS-A/B loop. The much larger side chain of Met at position 326 of SIM2 likely causes a steric clash with the tip of the loop containing Ser220 of SIM2, possibly reorganizing the loop at the SIM2:ARNT2 interface and disrupting allostery between the two domains (Figure 6F).

Although SIM2 is an essential gene, its exact functions and molecular pathways are still not well understood. Mouse models have established that deletion of the Sim2 gene produces a variety of developmental phenotypes; however, the extent to which SIM2 gene variants cause or contribute to human pathologies remains undetermined. Recently a study proposed a homozygous SIM2 variant (p.Tyr154Cys) as the cause of the clinical presentation in a child with craniofacial abnormalities, developmental delay and intellectual disability [25]. Understanding the molecular basis of how non-synonymous nucleotide variants can alter the activity of SIM2 will not only provide a greater understanding of the way SIM2 functions as a transcription factor but could also highlight the possibility of these variants causing or contributing to human disease.

To study whether single amino acid SIM2 variants found in patients with intellectual disabilities cause functional changes in activity, we used an in vitro cell-based system. This consisted of stable cell lines harbouring site-specific inducible expression cassettes for WT SIM2s or mutant variants, which were used to compare relative outputs on a reporter gene. Out of the nine variants selected from the patient exome sequencing dataset, five of these showed a clear significant reduction in transcriptional activity compared with the WT protein (Figure 1). These variants lie across known important functional domains of the protein where there is strong potential for amino acid changes to disrupt protein function. While there are no known human variants linked with human disease as of yet, this finding highlights the possibility that human SIM2 variants can significantly change protein activity.

Further functional analysis of the activity-deficient variants was performed in order to elucidate the mechanism behind the reduced transcriptional activity. As SIM2 must dimerize with ARNT or ARNT2 to form a functional transcription factor, co-immunoprecipitation experiments were used to determine the capacity of these variants to form dimers with ARNT2. This showed that the W306R and R163X variants had little or no capacity to dimerize with ARNT2. The W306R variant lies within the previously defined ‘hot spot' region for dimerization [20], confirming that residues within this region form a critical interaction surface. The R163X variant is truncated after the first PAS repeat of the PAS domain (PAS-A). It has been shown previously that the entire PAS domain (PAS-A and PAS-B) is important for SIM2 to dimerize with ARNT2 [20]. Therefore, our truncated variant lacking PAS-B confirmed the expected dimerization deficiency. Consistent with previously reported data for the closely related protein SIM1, where the variant SIM1 V326F did not influence dimerization [20], the identically located SIM2s V326M variant had no change in ARNT2 dimerization compared with the WT protein.

Complementary to the co-immunoprecipitation data, competition reporter gene assays showed that the W306R and R163X variants failed to repress the activity of the related bHLH/PAS factor, HIF1α, whereas WT SIM2 and the dimerization efficient variants afforded near full repression of HIF1α on a hypoxic response element. While the functional relevance of the competition between HIF1α and SIM2 in vivo during development is yet to be established, this loss of competition could have functional and phenotypic consequences. The interaction between genes and the environment has been implicated in the penetrance of scoliosis. Instances of hypoxia during embryogenesis can significantly increase the penetrance of scoliosis in mice that are heterozygous for genes associated with human scoliosis [26]. Many the patients with SIM2 variants (E19K, V326M, R163X) have scoliosis, a phenotype that is seen in both the heterozygous and homozygous Sim2 knockout mouse model with incomplete penetrance. Together these observations suggest that SIM2 may be a susceptibility allele for scoliosis, increasing the incidence of this phenotype, likely in combination with environmental stresses (such as hypoxia) or other gene variants. It is possible that the competition between SIM2 and HIF1α may come into play here, which could be tested through generating mouse models of these variants and observing the penetrance of scoliosis with and without other environmental stresses, such as hypoxic events during embryogenesis, or genetic variants which have been shown to promote scoliosis [26].

It has previously been established that SIM2 is localized to the nucleus in cells [20,23]. Immunofluorescence analysis of the SIM2 variants showed that most are localized to the nucleus, with the exception of the R163X, which is localized throughout the cell. As this variant is truncated before the NLS and small in size, this result is to be expected. While such a change in localization would dampen transcriptional outputs of SIM2, we found this variant was also defective for ARNT2 dimerization and additionally has a lower level of expression compared with the WT protein. These properties in combination are the likely reason why this variant has essentially null activity on the CME reporter gene. It is also possible that the native R163X transcript would be subject to nonsense-mediated decay in vivo due to the introduction of a premature stop codon, resulting in severely reduced protein being produced from this allele. As the truncated protein is being expressed from cDNA in our experimental cell lines, it was not possible for us to test if this is the case.

Homology modelling indicated that the E19K and W306R activity-deficient missense variants are likely located at SIM2:ARNT2 dimer interfaces, while E224 and V326M lie adjacent to interfaces. However, by co-immunoprecipitation only one (W306R) showed a clear reduction in dimerization, suggesting that structural perturbations occurring at or near interfaces affect other protein properties important for activity, such as allostery. Analysis of the mouse HIF-2α : ARNT crystal structure (4ZPK) suggests a conserved role for HIF-2α W318 (equivalent position to W306 in SIM2) in promoting favourable interaction with the ARNT PAS-A domain (Figure 6B). Strikingly, crystal structures show this interaction is disrupted by the HIFa antagonist proflavine, which prevents HIFa/ARNT dimerization in biochemical assays [24,27]. Notably, Wu et al. [28] identified this Trp as being highly conserved in bHLH/PAS family members that dimerize with ARNT or ARNT2, suggesting its crucial role in dimerization that we have established for SIM2 may be general within the protein family. It is, therefore, also likely that mutation of Trp at equivalent positions in ARNT2 partner proteins would have deleterious effects on heterodimerization and ultimately function.

The E19K variant is close in proximity to the basic DNA binding region but does not appear to be in direct contact with the DNA response element. ChIP studies showed that the E19K variant has reduced DNA binding capabilities compared with the WT protein, so it is possible that this variant may be disrupting DNA binding through structural changes of the bHLH-motif caused by physicochemical properties of the E to K change. The E224K and V326M variants lie within regions encompassing the PAS-B domain, which is known to serve as a ligand-binding domain for other members of the bHLH/PAS protein family [29]. PAS domains are also known to mediate protein : protein interactions [30–34]. It is, therefore, possible that these variants are disrupting interactions with endogenous ligands or cofactors that are required for SIM2s function, or disrupt intramolecular allostery between the SIM2 PAS domains. As there are no known ligands for SIM2 and cofactors required for SIM2s transcriptional activity are yet to be discovered, these models cannot currently be tested.

While this study clearly shows that these SIM2 variants are transcriptionally deficient within the in vitro cell-based assays, these data do not show that these effects alone would translate to a clinical phenotype in patients. However, it is worth noting that while there were some commonalities in phenotypes for patients harbouring these variants, the complete clinical phenotypes were broadly diverse, and some patients also harbour gene variants that have either been linked to, or are potentially associated with, human pathologies (see Table 1). These observations suggest that rather than SIM2 variant alleles being directly causative of human pathologies, it is more likely that the variants represent susceptibility alleles, where deficient SIM2 functions contribute to human pathologies in combination with other gene variants. In addition, the SIM2 variants reported in this study when present in a homozygous or compound heterozygous state may result in developmental abnormalities in humans. Future animal studies that recapitulate the SIM2 variants will be critical to assess their relative contribution(s) to the patient developmental phenotypes. In conclusion, this study has identified an additional set of four amino acids that are important for SIM2 to function as a transcription factor and provides a reference list that will be useful as more patients with intellectual disability and/or developmental abnormalities are discovered to harbour SIM2 anomalies.

A database of ∼8600 patients undergoing clinical exome sequencing at Baylor Genetics was searched for rare SIM2 variants. A majority of patients (∼78%) were referred for phenotypes including neurologic symptoms. Most individuals (∼92%) had proband-only sequencing, so the inheritance of variants was not determined. Exome sequencing was conducted according to previously described methods [35].

Human SIM2s-2xHA-3xFLAG and variants were generated through PCR amplification and mutagenesis and cloned into pENTR1A by Gibson assembly [36]. These were then subcloned into pcDNA5-FRT/TO-Gateway through LR recombination according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). Plasmids pEF-ARNT2-IRES-neo [37] and pGL3-4HRE luciferase [38] have been described previously. pML-6CME was a gift from Dr J Pelletier (Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada).

Cells were cultivated in DMEM (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; Gibco) with 10% FBS (Gibco), 2 mM GlutaMAX (Gibco), 10 000 units/ml penicillin and 10 mg/ml Streptomycin (Invitrogen) at 37°C, 5% CO₂. Stable cell lines were generated using the Flp-in T-REx293 system according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen).

CME SIM2 activity assays: T-REx293 stable cell lines were seeded in a 24-well tray in triplicate. The following day cells were transfected with 0.1 ng pRL-CMV (Promega), 400 ng pML-6xCME and 50 ng of pEF-ARNT2-IRES-neo using PEI (polyethylenimine) (Polysciences, U.S.A.) transfection reagent [39]. Seven hours after transfection media was replaced with complete medium containing 1 µg/ml doxycycline (dox) (Sigma). Cells were harvested 20 h after dox induction with passive lysis buffer (Promega). Dual Luciferase assays (Promega) were carried out according to the manufacturer's protocol using Promega GloMax™ 96 Microplate Luminometer for at least three biological replicates. To calculate relative luciferase units (RLUs) Firefly luciferase units were normalized to Renilla luciferase units. RLUs were then used to calculate the means of the triplicate transfections for each biological replicate.

HIF1α competition assay: T-REx293 stable cell lines were seeded as above and transfected with 0.1 ng pCMV-RL (renilla luciferase) and 400 ng pGL3-4xHRE luciferase. Seven hours post-transfection media was replaced with complete medium containing 1 µg/ml dox and 1 mM DMOG (Sigma–Aldrich) to induce HIF1α expression. Twenty hours after dox and DMOG treatment cells were harvested and dual-luciferase assays were performed as above.

Samples were separated by SDS–PAGE using 7.5%, 12% or 4–20% Mini-PROTEAN® TGX™ Precast Gels (Bio-Rad) before being transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using Trans-Blot® Turbo™ Transfer System (Bio-Rad) and probed with the following primary antibodies; anti-FLAG (M2, Sigma), anti-ARNT2 (M165, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-HA (C29F4, Cell Signalling) and anti-α-tubulin (MCA78G, Bio-Rad). Blots were probed with the following secondary antibodies; goat anti-mouse HRP (Pierce), goat anti-rabbit HRP (Pierce) and rabbit anti-rat HRP (Dako) and developed using Clarity™ Western ECL Blotting Substrates (Bio-Rad). Blots were imaged with a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP Imaging System.

For the SIM2s WT, E19K, E224K, W306R and V326M variant immunoprecipitations (IP); T-REx293 cells were treated with 1 µg/µl dox for 6 h before lysis and protein extraction. For the R163X variant IP; HEK 293T cells were transfected with 1 µg of pEF-ARNT2-IRES-neo and either 1 µg of pcDNA5-FRT/TO-SIM2s-HA-FLAG plasmid or 5 µg pcDNA5-FRT/TO-R163X-SIM2s-HA-FLAG plasmid. Proteins were immunoprecipitated with FLAG M2 resin (Sigma–Aldrich) overnight at 4°C. Following washes, proteins were eluted from the resin by boiling in 4× SDS load buffer (20% glycerol, 2.5% SDS, 200 mM DTT) and analyzed by immunoblotting.

Cells were seeded on a glass coverslip and allowed to settle overnight. After treatment for 24 h with dox, cells were fixed with 4% PFA (Sigma), permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 (Sigma) and blocked with 10% normal horse serum. Coverslips were incubated with anti-FLAG antibody (M2, Sigma) overnight at 4°C followed by donkey α-mouse Alexa Fluor® 594 (Invitrogen) at room temperature for 2 h. Coverslips were then mounted onto glass slides with ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen). Images were taken using a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope and Nikon Digital Sight DS-Qi1 camera.

Cells were seeded in a T175 flask and allowed to settle overnight before being transfected with 20 µg pML-6xCME using PEI transfection reagent. Seven hours after transfection media was replaced with complete medium containing 1 µg/ml doxycycline (dox) (Sigma). After 24 h dox induction cells were cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. Chromatin extracts were prepared and immunoprecipitation performed as described previously [40]. Immunoprecipitation was performed with 5 µg of anti-SIM2 antibody (21069-1-AP, Proteintech), or control anti-rabbit antibody (cyclin D2, M-20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). ChIP samples were purified through NucleoSpin DNA columns (Macherey-Nagel) using QIAGEN PCR Purification kit buffers according to the manufacturer's instructions and analyzed by qPCR using primers designed to amplify the 6xCME region of the pML-6xCME reporter plasmid.

Data from the dual-luciferase assays are presented normalized to the control of that group (WT SIM2s for CME activity assays or parent T-REx293 line + DMOG for HIF1α competition assays) as mean; error bars represent the standard error of the mean (±SEM). Data from the ChIP assays are presented as percent enrichment of the 6xCME response element compared with input; error bars represent standard deviation (±SD). Statistical analysis was performed on log-transformed data. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparisons test was performed using GraphPad Prism version 9.0 for MacOS, GraphPad Software, La Jolla California U.S.A., www.graphpad.com.

All simulations were carried out in ICM Pro software suite (Molsoft) [41]. Homology models were carried out in the Homology Model module of ICM Pro [42,43]. SIM2 (Uniprot: Q14190) and ARNT2 (Uniprot: Q9HBZ2) homology models were first created separately and docked together, and on DNA, using the HIF2α : ARNT : DNA co-crystal structure (PDB:4ZPK) as a reference [24]. Further regularization, minimization and model refinement were then carried out to ensure the integrity of the dimer interface and interactions of the individual mutations. Figures were created using UCSF ChimeraX [44].

All data and reagents are available upon request.

The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

This work was supported by clinical genetic testing at the Baylor Genetics Laboratories and the Biochemistry Research Trust Fund, University of Adelaide.

Open access for this article was enabled by the participation of University of Adelaide in an all-inclusive Read & Publish agreement with Portland Press and the Biochemical Society under a transformative agreement with CAUL.

Emily Lyn Button: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing — original draft. Joseph J. Rossi: Investigation, Writing — review and editing. Daniel P. McDougal: Investigation, Visualization. John B. Bruning: Investigation, Visualization. Daniel Peet: Conceptualization, Writing — review and editing. David Bersten: Conceptualization, Writing— review and editing. Jill Rosenfeld: Resources, Writing — review and editing. Murray Whitelaw: Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing — review and editing.

ChIP

chromatin immunoprecipitation

CME

central midline element

DSCR

Down syndrome critical region

HRE

hypoxia response element

IP

immunoprecipitations

NLS

nuclear localization signal

PEI

polyethylenimine

SIM2

single-minded 2

SIM2l

SIM2-long

SIM2s

SIM2-short